Android IPC机制详解

来源:互联网 发布:名器哪款接近真人知乎 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/04/29 09:07

文章出处:http://www.limodev.cn/blog

http://blog.csdn.net/stevenliyong/archive/2009/08/27/4489525.aspx

IBinder接口

IBinder接口是对跨进程的对象的抽象。普通对象在当前进程可以访问,如果希望对象能被其它进程访问,那就必须实现IBinder接口。IBinder接口可以指向本地对象,也可以指向远程对象,调用者不需要关心指向的对象是本地的还是远程。

transact是IBinder接口中一个比较重要的函数,它的函数原型如下:

 

virtual status_t transact(uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags = 0) = 0;

android中的IPC的基本模型是基于客户/服务器(C/S)架构的。

 

客户端请求通过内核模块中转服务端

如果IBinder指向的是一个客户端代理,那transact只是把请求发送给服务器。服务端的IBinder的transact则提供了实际的服务。

o 客户端

BpBinder是远程对象在当前进程的代理,它实现了IBinder接口。它的transact函数实现如下:

 

status_t BpBinder::transact(
uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
{
// Once a binder has died, it will never come back to life.
if (mAlive) {
status_t status = IPCThreadState::self()->transact(
mHandle, code, data, reply, flags);
if (status == DEAD_OBJECT) mAlive = 0;
return status;
}

return DEAD_OBJECT;
}

参数说明:

  • code 是请求的ID号。
  • data 是请求的参数。
  • reply 是返回的结果。
  • flags 一些额外的标识,如FLAG_ONEWAY。通常为0。
  • transact只是简单的调用了IPCThreadState::self()的transact,在IPCThreadState::transact中:

     

    status_t IPCThreadState::transact(int32_t handle,
    uint32_t code, const Parcel& data,
    Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
    {
    status_t err = data.errorCheck();

    flags |= TF_ACCEPT_FDS;

    IF_LOG_TRANSACTIONS() {
    TextOutput::Bundle _b(alog);
    alog << "BC_TRANSACTION thr " << (void*)pthread_self() << " / hand "
    << handle << " / code " << TypeCode(code) << ": "
    << indent << data << dedent << endl;
    }

    if (err == NO_ERROR) {
    LOG_ONEWAY(">>>> SEND from pid %d uid %d %s", getpid(), getuid(),
    (flags & TF_ONE_WAY) == 0 ? "READ REPLY" : "ONE WAY");
    err = writeTransactionData(BC_TRANSACTION, flags, handle, code, data, NULL);
    }

    if (err != NO_ERROR) {
    if (reply) reply->setError(err);
    return (mLastError = err);
    }

    if ((flags & TF_ONE_WAY) == 0) {
    if (reply) {
    err = waitForResponse(reply);
    } else {
    Parcel fakeReply;
    err = waitForResponse(&fakeReply);
    }

    IF_LOG_TRANSACTIONS() {
    TextOutput::Bundle _b(alog);
    alog << "BR_REPLY thr " << (void*)pthread_self() << " / hand "
    << handle << ": ";
    if (reply) alog << indent << *reply << dedent << endl;
    else alog << "(none requested)" << endl;
    }
    } else {
    err = waitForResponse(NULL, NULL);
    }

    return err;
    }

    status_t IPCThreadState::waitForResponse(Parcel *reply, status_t *acquireResult)
    {
    int32_t cmd;
    int32_t err;

    while (1) {
    if ((err=talkWithDriver()) < NO_ERROR) break;
    err = mIn.errorCheck();
    if (err < NO_ERROR) break;
    if (mIn.dataAvail() == 0) continue;

    cmd = mIn.readInt32();

    IF_LOG_COMMANDS() {
    alog << "Processing waitForResponse Command: "
    << getReturnString(cmd) << endl;
    }

    switch (cmd) {
    case BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE:
    if (!reply && !acquireResult) goto finish;
    break;

    case BR_DEAD_REPLY:
    err = DEAD_OBJECT;
    goto finish;

    case BR_FAILED_REPLY:
    err = FAILED_TRANSACTION;
    goto finish;

    case BR_ACQUIRE_RESULT:
    {
    LOG_ASSERT(acquireResult != NULL, "Unexpected brACQUIRE_RESULT");
    const int32_t result = mIn.readInt32();
    if (!acquireResult) continue;
    *acquireResult = result ? NO_ERROR : INVALID_OPERATION;
    }
    goto finish;

    case BR_REPLY:
    {
    binder_transaction_data tr;
    err = mIn.read(&tr, sizeof(tr));
    LOG_ASSERT(err == NO_ERROR, "Not enough command data for brREPLY");
    if (err != NO_ERROR) goto finish;

    if (reply) {
    if ((tr.flags & TF_STATUS_CODE) == 0) {
    reply->ipcSetDataReference(
    reinterpret_cast(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
    tr.data_size,
    reinterpret_cast(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
    tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t),
    freeBuffer, this);
    } else {
    err = *static_cast(tr.data.ptr.buffer);
    freeBuffer(NULL,
    reinterpret_cast(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
    tr.data_size,
    reinterpret_cast(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
    tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t), this);
    }
    } else {
    freeBuffer(NULL,
    reinterpret_cast(tr.data.ptr.buffer),
    tr.data_size,
    reinterpret_cast(tr.data.ptr.offsets),
    tr.offsets_size/sizeof(size_t), this);
    continue;
    }
    }
    goto finish;

    default:
    err = executeCommand(cmd);
    if (err != NO_ERROR) goto finish;
    break;
    }
    }

    finish:
    if (err != NO_ERROR) {
    if (acquireResult) *acquireResult = err;
    if (reply) reply->setError(err);
    mLastError = err;
    }

    return err;
    }

    这里transact把请求经内核模块发送了给服务端,服务端处理完请求之后,沿原路返回结果给调用者。这里也可以看出请求是同步操作,它会等待直到结果返回为止。

    在BpBinder之上进行简单包装,我们可以得到与服务对象相同的接口,调用者无需要关心调用的对象是远程的还是本地的。拿ServiceManager来说:
    (frameworks/base/libs/utils/IServiceManager.cpp)

     

    class BpServiceManager : public BpInterface
    {
    public:
    BpServiceManager(const sp& impl)
    : BpInterface(impl)
    {
    }
    ...
    virtual status_t addService(const String16& name, const sp& service)
    {
    Parcel data, reply;
    data.writeInterfaceToken(IServiceManager::getInterfaceDescriptor());
    data.writeString16(name);
    data.writeStrongBinder(service);
    status_t err = remote()->transact(ADD_SERVICE_TRANSACTION, data, &reply);
    return err == NO_ERROR ? reply.readInt32() : err;
    }
    ...
    };

    BpServiceManager实现了 IServiceManager和IBinder两个接口,调用者可以把BpServiceManager的对象看作是一个 IServiceManager对象或者IBinder对象。当调用者把BpServiceManager对象当作IServiceManager对象使用时,所有的请求只是对BpBinder::transact的封装。这样的封装使得调用者不需要关心IServiceManager对象是本地的还是远程的了。

    客户通过defaultServiceManager函数来创建BpServiceManager对象:
    (frameworks/base/libs/utils/IServiceManager.cpp)

     

    sp<IServiceManager> defaultServiceManager()
    {
    if (gDefaultServiceManager != NULL) return gDefaultServiceManager;

    {
    AutoMutex _l(gDefaultServiceManagerLock);
    if (gDefaultServiceManager == NULL) {
    gDefaultServiceManager = interface_cast<IServiceManager>(
    ProcessState::self()->getContextObject(NULL));
    }
    }

    return gDefaultServiceManager;
    }

    先通过ProcessState::self()->getContextObject(NULL)创建一个Binder对象,然后通过 interface_cast和IMPLEMENT_META_INTERFACE(ServiceManager, “android.os.IServiceManager”)把Binder对象包装成 IServiceManager对象。原理上等同于创建了一个BpServiceManager对象。

    ProcessState::self()->getContextObject调用ProcessState::getStrongProxyForHandle创建代理对象:

     

    sp<IBinder> ProcessState::getStrongProxyForHandle(int32_t handle)
    {
    sp<IBinder> result;

    AutoMutex _l(mLock);

    handle_entry* e = lookupHandleLocked(handle);

    if (e != NULL) {
    // We need to create a new BpBinder if there isn't currently one, OR we
    // are unable to acquire a weak reference on this current one. See comment
    // in getWeakProxyForHandle() for more info about this.
    IBinder* b = e->binder;
    if (b == NULL || !e->refs->attemptIncWeak(this)) {
    b = new BpBinder(handle);
    e->binder = b;
    if (b) e->refs = b->getWeakRefs();
    result = b;
    } else {
    // This little bit of nastyness is to allow us to add a primary
    // reference to the remote proxy when this team doesn't have one
    // but another team is sending the handle to us.
    result.force_set(b);
    e->refs->decWeak(this);
    }
    }

    return result;
    }

    如果handle为空,默认为context_manager对象,context_manager实际上就是ServiceManager。
    o 服务端
    服务端也要实现IBinder接口,BBinder类对IBinder接口提供了部分默认实现,其中transact的实现如下:

     

    status_t BBinder::transact(
    uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
    {
    data.setDataPosition(0);

    status_t err = NO_ERROR;
    switch (code) {
    case PING_TRANSACTION:
    reply->writeInt32(pingBinder());
    break;
    default:
    err = onTransact(code, data, reply, flags);
    break;
    }

    if (reply != NULL) {
    reply->setDataPosition(0);
    }

    return err;
    }

    PING_TRANSACTION请求用来检查对象是否还存在,这里简单的把 pingBinder的返回值返回给调用者。其它的请求交给onTransact处理。onTransact是BBinder里声明的一个 protected类型的虚函数,这个要求它的子类去实现。比如CameraService里的实现如下:

     

    status_t CameraService::onTransact(
    uint32_t code, const Parcel& data, Parcel* reply, uint32_t flags)
    {
    // permission checks...
    switch (code) {
    case BnCameraService::CONNECT:
    IPCThreadState* ipc = IPCThreadState::self();
    const int pid = ipc->getCallingPid();
    const int self_pid = getpid();
    if (pid != self_pid) {
    // we're called from a different process, do the real check
    if (!checkCallingPermission(
    String16("android.permission.CAMERA")))
    {
    const int uid = ipc->getCallingUid();
    LOGE("Permission Denial: "
    "can't use the camera pid=%d, uid=%d", pid, uid);
    return PERMISSION_DENIED;
    }
    }
    break;
    }

    status_t err = BnCameraService::onTransact(code, data, reply, flags);

    LOGD("+++ onTransact err %d code %d", err, code);

    if (err == UNKNOWN_TRANSACTION || err == PERMISSION_DENIED) {
    // the 'service' command interrogates this binder for its name, and then supplies it
    // even for the debugging commands. that means we need to check for it here, using
    // ISurfaceComposer (since we delegated the INTERFACE_TRANSACTION handling to
    // BnSurfaceComposer before falling through to this code).

    LOGD("+++ onTransact code %d", code);

    CHECK_INTERFACE(ICameraService, data, reply);

    switch(code) {
    case 1000:
    {
    if (gWeakHeap != 0) {
    sp h = gWeakHeap.promote();
    IMemoryHeap *p = gWeakHeap.unsafe_get();
    LOGD("CHECKING WEAK REFERENCE %p (%p)", h.get(), p);
    if (h != 0)
    h->printRefs();
    bool attempt_to_delete = data.readInt32() == 1;
    if (attempt_to_delete) {
    // NOT SAFE!
    LOGD("DELETING WEAK REFERENCE %p (%p)", h.get(), p);
    if (p) delete p;
    }
    return NO_ERROR;
    }
    }
    break;
    default:
    break;
    }
    }
    return err;
    }

    由此可见,服务端的onTransact是一个请求分发函数,它根据请求码(code)做相应的处理。

    o 消息循环

    服务端(任何进程都可以作为服务端)有一个线程监听来自客户端的请求,并循环处理这些请求。

    如果在主线程中处理请求,可以直接调用下面的函数:

     

    IPCThreadState::self()->joinThreadPool(mIsMain);

    如果想在非主线程中处理请求,可以按下列方式:

     

            sp
    proc = ProcessState::self();
    if (proc->supportsProcesses()) {
    LOGV("App process: starting thread pool./n");
    proc->startThreadPool();
    }

    startThreadPool的实现原理:

     

    void ProcessState::startThreadPool()
    {
    AutoMutex _l(mLock);
    if (!mThreadPoolStarted) {
    mThreadPoolStarted = true;
    spawnPooledThread(true);
    }
    }

    void ProcessState::spawnPooledThread(bool isMain)
    {
    if (mThreadPoolStarted) {
    int32_t s = android_atomic_add(1, &mThreadPoolSeq);
    char buf[32];
    sprintf(buf, "Binder Thread #%d", s);
    LOGV("Spawning new pooled thread, name=%s/n", buf);
    sp
    t = new PoolThread(isMain);
    t->run(buf);
    }
    }

    这里创建了PoolThread的对象,实现上就是创建了一个线程。所有的线程类都要实现threadLoop虚函数。PoolThread的threadLoop的实现如下:

     

        virtual bool threadLoop()
    {
    IPCThreadState::self()->joinThreadPool(mIsMain);
    return false;
    }

    上述代码,简而言之就是创建了一个线程,然后在线程里调用 IPCThreadState::self()->joinThreadPool函数。

    下面再看joinThreadPool的实现:

     

    do
    {
    ...
    result = talkWithDriver();
    if (result >= NO_ERROR) {
    size_t IN = mIn.dataAvail();
    if (IN < sizeof(int32_t)) continue;
    cmd = mIn.readInt32();
    IF_LOG_COMMANDS() {
    alog << "Processing top-level Command: "
    << getReturnString(cmd) << endl;
    }
    result = executeCommand(cmd);
    }
    ...
    while(...);

    这个函数在循环中重复执行下列动作:

    1. talkWithDriver 通过ioctl(mProcess->mDriverFD, BINDER_WRITE_READ, &bwr)读取请求和写回结果。
    2. executeCommand 执行相应的请求

    在IPCThreadState::executeCommand(int32_t cmd)函数中:

    1. 对于控制对象生命周期的请求,像BR_ACQUIRE/BR_RELEASE直接做了处理。
    2. 对于BR_TRANSACTION请求,它调用被请求对象的transact函数。

    按下列方式调用实际的对象:

     

    if (tr.target.ptr) {
    sp<BBinder> b((BBinder*)tr.cookie);
    const status_t error = b->transact(tr.code, buffer, &reply, 0);
    if (error < NO_ERROR) reply.setError(error);

    } else {
    const status_t error = the_context_object->transact(tr.code, buffer, &reply, 0);
    if (error < NO_ERROR) reply.setError(error);
    }

    如果tr.target.ptr不为空,就把tr.cookie转换成一个Binder对象,并调用它的transact函数。如果没有目标对象,就调用 the_context_object对象的transact函数。奇怪的是,根本没有谁对the_context_object进行初始化,the_context_object是空指针。原因是context_mgr的请求发给了ServiceManager,所以根本不会走到else 语句里来。

    o 内核模块

    android使用了一个内核模块binder来中转各个进程之间的消息。模块源代码放在binder.c里,它是一个字符驱动程序,主要通过 binder_ioctl与用户空间的进程交换数据。其中BINDER_WRITE_READ用来读写数据,数据包中有一个cmd域用于区分不同的请求:

    1. binder_thread_write用于发送请求或返回结果。
    2. binder_thread_read用于读取结果。

    从binder_thread_write中调用binder_transaction中转请求和返回结果,binder_transaction的实现如下:

    对请求的处理:

    1. 通过对象的handle找到对象所在的进程,如果handle为空就认为对象是context_mgr,把请求发给context_mgr所在的进程。
    2. 把请求中所有的binder对象全部放到一个RB树中。
    3. 把请求放到目标进程的队列中,等待目标进程读取。

    如何成为context_mgr呢?内核模块提供了BINDER_SET_CONTEXT_MGR调用:

     

    static long binder_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
    {
    ...
    case BINDER_SET_CONTEXT_MGR:
    if (binder_context_mgr_node != NULL) {
    printk(KERN_ERR "binder: BINDER_SET_CONTEXT_MGR already set/n");
    ret = -EBUSY;
    goto err;
    }
    if (binder_context_mgr_uid != -1) {
    if (binder_context_mgr_uid != current->euid) {
    printk(KERN_ERR "binder: BINDER_SET_"
    "CONTEXT_MGR bad uid %d != %d/n",
    current->euid,
    binder_context_mgr_uid);
    ret = -EPERM;
    goto err;
    }
    } else
    binder_context_mgr_uid = current->euid;
    binder_context_mgr_node = binder_new_node(proc, NULL, NULL);
    if (binder_context_mgr_node == NULL) {
    ret = -ENOMEM;
    goto err;
    }
    binder_context_mgr_node->local_weak_refs++;
    binder_context_mgr_node->local_strong_refs++;
    binder_context_mgr_node->has_strong_ref = 1;
    binder_context_mgr_node->has_weak_ref = 1;
    break;

    ServiceManager(frameworks/base/cmds/servicemanager)通过下列方式成为了context_mgr进程:

     

    int binder_become_context_manager(struct binder_state *bs)
    {
    return ioctl(bs->fd, BINDER_SET_CONTEXT_MGR, 0);
    }

    int main(int argc, char **argv)
    {
    struct binder_state *bs;
    void *svcmgr = BINDER_SERVICE_MANAGER;

    bs = binder_open(128*1024);

    if (binder_become_context_manager(bs)) {
    LOGE("cannot become context manager (%s)/n", strerror(errno));
    return -1;
    }

    svcmgr_handle = svcmgr;
    binder_loop(bs, svcmgr_handler);
    return 0;
    }

    o 如何得到服务对象的handle

    1. 服务提供者通过defaultServiceManager得到ServiceManager对象,然后调用addService向服务管理器注册。
    2. 服务使用者通过defaultServiceManager得到ServiceManager对象,然后调用getService通过服务名称查找到服务对象的handle。

    o 如何通过服务对象的handle找到服务所在的进程

    0表示服务管理器的handle,getService可以查找到系统服务的handle。这个handle只是代表了服务对象,内核模块是如何通过handle找到服务所在的进程的呢?

    1. 对于ServiceManager: ServiceManager调用了binder_become_context_manager使用自己成为context_mgr,所有handle为0的请求都会被转发给ServiceManager。
    2. 对于系统服务和应用程序的Listener,在第一次请求内核模块时(比如调用addService),内核模块在一个RB树中建立了服务对象和进程的对应关系。
      off_end = (void *)offp + tr->offsets_size;
      for (; offp < off_end; offp++) {
      struct flat_binder_object *fp;
      if (*offp > t->buffer->data_size - sizeof(*fp)) {
      binder_user_error("binder: %d:%d got transaction with "
      "invalid offset, %d/n",
      proc->pid, thread->pid, *offp);
      return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
      goto err_bad_offset;
      }
      fp = (struct flat_binder_object *)(t->buffer->data + *offp);
      switch (fp->type) {
      case BINDER_TYPE_BINDER:
      case BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_BINDER: {
      struct binder_ref *ref;
      struct binder_node *node = binder_get_node(proc, fp->binder);
      if (node == NULL) {
      node = binder_new_node(proc, fp->binder, fp->cookie);
      if (node == NULL) {
      return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
      goto err_binder_new_node_failed;
      }
      node->min_priority = fp->flags & FLAT_BINDER_FLAG_PRIORITY_MASK;
      node->accept_fds = !!(fp->flags & FLAT_BINDER_FLAG_ACCEPTS_FDS);
      }
      if (fp->cookie != node->cookie) {
      binder_user_error("binder: %d:%d sending u%p "
      "node %d, cookie mismatch %p != %p/n",
      proc->pid, thread->pid,
      fp->binder, node->debug_id,
      fp->cookie, node->cookie);
      goto err_binder_get_ref_for_node_failed;
      }
      ref = binder_get_ref_for_node(target_proc, node);
      if (ref == NULL) {
      return_error = BR_FAILED_REPLY;
      goto err_binder_get_ref_for_node_failed;
      }
      if (fp->type == BINDER_TYPE_BINDER)
      fp->type = BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE;
      else
      fp->type = BINDER_TYPE_WEAK_HANDLE;
      fp->handle = ref->desc;
      binder_inc_ref(ref, fp->type == BINDER_TYPE_HANDLE, &thread->todo);
      if (binder_debug_mask & BINDER_DEBUG_TRANSACTION)
      printk(KERN_INFO " node %d u%p -> ref %d desc %d/n",
      node->debug_id, node->ptr, ref->debug_id, ref->desc);
      } break;
    3. 请求服务时,内核先通过handle找到对应的进程,然后把请求放到服务进程的队列中。

    o C调用JAVA

    前面我们分析的是C代码的处理。对于JAVA代码,JAVA调用C的函数通过JNI调用即可。从内核时读取请求是在C代码(executeCommand)里进行了,那如何在C代码中调用那些用JAVA实现的服务呢?

    android_os_Binder_init里的JavaBBinder对Java里的Binder对象进行包装。

    JavaBBinder::onTransact调用Java里的execTransact函数:

     

            jboolean res = env->CallBooleanMethod(mObject, gBinderOffsets.mExecTransact,
    code, (int32_t)&data, (int32_t)reply, flags);
    jthrowable excep = env->ExceptionOccurred();
    if (excep) {
    report_exception(env, excep,
    "*** Uncaught remote exception! "
    "(Exceptions are not yet supported across processes.)");
    res = JNI_FALSE;

    /* clean up JNI local ref -- we don't return to Java code */
    env->DeleteLocalRef(excep);
    }

    o 广播消息

    binder不提供广播消息,不过可以ActivityManagerService服务来实现广播。
    (frameworks/base/core/java/android/app/ActivityManagerNative.java)

    接收广播消息需要实现接口BroadcastReceiver,然后调用ActivityManagerProxy::registerReceiver注册。

    触发广播调用ActivityManagerProxy::broadcastIntent。(应用程序并不直接调用它,而是调用Context对它的包装)

    原创粉丝点击