How To Think Logically
来源:互联网 发布:钢琴入门自学教程知乎 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/04/30 08:35
How To Think Logically
Base your writing on logical thinking. Learn to use inductive and deductive reasoning in your writing. Avoid common fallacies.
INDUCTIVE REASONING: When you reason inductively, you begin with a number of instances (facts or observations) and use them to draw a general conclusion. Whenever you interpret evidence, you reason inductively. The use of probability to form a generalization is called an inductive leap. Inductive arguments, rather than producing certainty, are thus intended to produce probable and believable conclusions. As your evidence mounts, your reader draws the conclusion that you intend. You must make sure that the amount of evidence is sufficient and not based on exceptional or biased sampling. Be sure that you have not ignored information that invalidates your conclusion (called the “neglected aspect”) or presented only evidence that supports a predetermined conclusion (known as “slanting”).
DEDUCTIVE REASONING: When you reason deductively, you begin with generalizations (premises) and apply them to a specific instance to draw a conclusion about that instance. Deductive reasoning often utilizes the syllogism, a line of thought consisting of a major premise, a minor premise and a conclusion; for example, All men are foolish (major premise); Smith is a man (minor premise); therefore, Smith is foolish (conclusion). Of course, your reader must accept the ideas or values that you choose as premises in order to accept the conclusion. Sometimes premises are not stated. A syllogism with an unstated major or minor premise, or even an unstated conclusion, needs to be examined with care because the omitted statement may contain an inaccurate generalization.
THE TOULMIN METHOD: Another way of viewing the process of logical thinking is through the Toulmin method. This model is less constrained than the syllogism and makes allowances for the important elements of probability, backing, or proof for the premise and rebuttal of the reader’s objections. This approach sees arguments as the progression from accepted facts or evidence (data) to a conclusion (claim) by way of a statement (warrant) that establishes a reasonable relationship between the two. The warrant is often implied in arguments, and like the unstated premise in the syllogism, needs careful examination to be acceptable. The writer can allow for exceptions to a major premise. Qualifiers such as probably, possibly, doubtless, and surely show the degree of certainty of the conclusion; rebuttal terms such as unless allow the writer to anticipate objections.
FALLACIES: A deductive argument must be both valid and true. A true argument is based on generally accepted, well-backed premises. Learn to distinguish between fact (based on verifiable data) and opinion (based on personal preferences). A valid argument follows a reasonable line of thinking.
Fallacies are faults in premises (truth) or in reasoning (validity). They may result from misusing or misrepresenting evidence, from relying on faulty premises or omitting a needed premise, or from distorting the issues. The following are some of the major forms of fallacies:
Non Sequitur: A statement that does not follow logically from what has just been said; in other words, a conclusion that does not follow from the premises.
Hasty Generalization: A generalization based on too little evidence or on exceptional or biased evidence.
Ad Hominem: Attacking the person who presents an issue rather than dealing logically with the issue itself.
Bandwagon: An argument saying, in effect, "Everyone's doing or saying or thinking this, so you should too."
Red Herring: Dodging the real issue by drawing attention to an irrelevant issue.
Either...Or: Stating that only two alternatives exist when in fact there are more than two.
False Analogy: The assumption that because two things are alike in some ways, they must be in other ways.
Equivocation: An assertion that falsely relies on the use of a term in two different senses.
Slippery Slope: The assumption that if one thing is allowed, it will be the first step in a downward spiral.
Oversimplification: A statement or argument that leaves out relevant considerations about an issue.
Begging the Question: An assertion that restates the point just made. Such an assertion is circular in that it draws as a conclusion a point stated in the premise.
False Cause: The assumption that because one event follows another, the first is the cause of the second. Sometimes called post hoc, ergo propter hoc ("after this, so because of this").
http://www.trinitysem.edu/Student/LessonInstruction/ThinkLogically.html
- How To Think Logically
- How to Think Critically
- how to think deeply -- 深刻
- How to Think About Algorithms
- How to Think Like a Computer Scientist
- How to Think Like a Computer Scientist
- some points to be think about how to create your
- Python入门读物摘要--How to think like a csor
- Thinking...!thinking life,think how to improve myself ablity quickly!
- How to think like open source pioneer Michael Tiemann
- 《How to think like a designer》思悟总结
- think about how to make the function close to really world
- 正在翻译HOW TO THINK LIKE A COMPUTE SCIENTIST ——LEARN PYTHON
- How to think like a Computer Scientist: 课后习题第三章 12题
- How to think like a computer scientist: 第四章 课后习题 1
- How to think like a Computer Scientist: 课后习题第四章 2题
- How to think like a computer scientist: 第五章 课后习题 9
- How to think like a computer scientist: 第四章 课后习题 5
- 解读linux的/proc下的statm、maps、memmap 内存信息文件分析
- 推荐 10 款 CSS 框架,网页设计就是这么简单
- MTK之NVRAM研究
- rqnoj 618 最大子正方形
- 为什么同步通信就需要两端时钟完全同步?
- How To Think Logically
- 4个国内免费DNS服务商
- 11111111
- 解决svn 冲突问题步骤
- 面向接口编程的好处
- ASP.NET Web Service 创建、部署与使用
- 指针与引用
- CString转char*
- MongoDB、HandlerSocket和MySQL性能测试及其结果分析