自然语言理解 原文摘录
来源:互联网 发布:柱状图软件 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/05/01 18:48
Roles and Subroles
Other Common Names
Definition
CAUSAL-AGENT
the object that caused the event
AGENT
intentional causation
INSTR
force/tool used in causing the event
THEME
PATIENT
the thing affected by the event
EXPERIENCER
the person involved in perception
or a physical/psychological state
BENEFICIARY
the person for whom an act is done
AT
the state/value on some dimension
AT-LOC
LOCATION
current location
AT-POSS
POSSESSOR
current possessor
AT-VALUE
current value
AT-TIME
current time
TO
final value in a state change
TO-LOC
DESTINATION
final location
TO-POSS
RECIPIENT
final possessor
TO-VALUE
final value
FROM
original value in a state change
FROM-LOC
SOURCE
original location
FROM-POSS
original possessor
FROM-VALUE
original value
PATH
path over which something travels
CO-AGENT
secondary agent in an action
CO-THEME
secondary theme in an exchange
Figure 8.5 Some possible semantic roles
This possibility will not be pursued further, however, since it leads into many issues not relevant to the remainder of this chapter.
Figure 8.5 provides a summary of most of the roles distinguished thus far and the hierarchical relationships between them.
As you've seen, verbs can be classified by the thematic roles that they require. To classify them precisely, however, you must make a distinction between roles that are "intimately" related to the verb and those that are not. For example, almost any past tense verb allows an AT-TIME role realized by the adverb "yesterday". Thus this role is apparently more a property of verb phrases in general than a property of any individual verb. However, other roles – namely, those realized by constituents for which the verb subcategorizes - seem to be properties of the verb. For example, the verb "put"subcategorizes for a PP, and furthermore, this PP must realize the TO-LOC role. In verb classification this latter type of role is important, and these roles are called theinner roles of the verb.
The preceding examples suggest one test for determining whether a given role is an inner role for a given verb: if the role is obligatory, it is an inner role. Other inner roles, however, appear to be optional, so other tests are also needed. Another test is based on the observation that all verbs may take at most one NP in
[Allen 1995: Chapter 8 – Semantics and Logical Form / 249]
any given inner role. If multiple NPs are needed, they must be related by a conjunction. Thus you can say
John and I ran to the store.
but not
* John I ran to the store.
Similarly, you can say
I ran to the store and to the bank.
but not
* I ran to the store to the bank.
Thus the AGENT and TO-LOC roles for the verb run are inner roles.
Verbs typically specify up to three inner roles, at least one of which must always be realized in any sentence using the verb. Sometimes a particular role must always be present (for example, TO-LOC with put). Typically, the THEME role is also obligatory, whereas the AGENT role is always optional for any verb that allows the passive form.
There are also syntactic restrictions on how various roles can be realized. Figure 8.6 shows a sample of ways that roles can be realized in different sentences.
The following are some sample sentences with each verb in italics and its argument, whether NP, PP. or embedded 5, classified by its role in order of occurrence:
Jack ran.
AGENT only
Jack ran with a crutch.
AGENT + INSTR
Jack ran with a crutch for Susan.
AGENT + INSTR +BENEFICIARY
Jack destroyed the car.
AGENT + THEME
Jack put the car through the wall.
AGENT + THEME +PATH
Jack sold Henry the car.
AGENT + TO-POSS +THEME
Henry pushed the car from Jack's house to the junkyard.
AGENT + THEME +FROM-LOC + TO-LOC
Jack is tall.
THEME
Henry believes that Jack is tall.
EXPERIENCER + THEME
Susan owns a car.
AT-POSS + THEME
I am in the closet.
THEME + AT-LOC
The ice melted.
THEME
Jack enjoyed the play.
EXPERIENCER + THEME
The ball rolled down the hill to the water.
THEME + PATH +TO-LOC
[Allen 1995: Chapter 8 – Semantics and Logical Form / 250]
Role
Realization
AGENT
as subject in active sentences
preposition by in passive sentences
THEME
as object of transitive verbs
s subject of nonaction verbs
INSTR
as subject in active sentences with no agent preposition with
EXPERIENCER
as animate subject in active sentences with no agent
BENEFICIARY
as indirect object with transitive verbs preposition for
AT-LOC
prepositions in, on, beyond, etc.
AT-POSS
possessive NP
as subject of sentence if no agent
TO-LOC
prepositions to, into
TO-POSS
preposition to, indirect object with certain verbs
FROM-LOC
prepositions from, out of, etc.
FROM-POSS
preposition from
- 自然语言理解 原文摘录
- 自然语言理解 摘录2
- 自然语言理解
- 自然语言理解
- 自然语言理解
- 自然语言理解机制
- 《自然语言理解》简介
- 自然语言理解-转移网络
- 自然语言理解技术
- 自然语言理解解决方案
- 自然语言理解双重路径
- 自然语言理解笔记
- [NLP]自然语言理解概述
- NLU自然语言理解
- 算法简单理解(摘录)
- 原来论文摘要并不是摘录原文,而是原文的总结和提炼
- 怎么做自然语言理解搜索
- 自然语言理解的实现方法
- Yaffs 文件系统分析
- Xen IO隔离方法及CPU调度脚本
- JSON语法格式 收藏
- (转)工行国际e卡申请,充值(美元)图文介绍 工行国际e卡申请,充值(美元)图文介绍
- Ubuntu只验证前8位密码
- 自然语言理解 原文摘录
- rpm包解压的方法
- spring配置文件详解
- 关于Hadoop的InputFormat类
- 算法的力量
- CentOS内核源码的安装方法
- 自然语言理解 摘录2
- CentOS 163源
- gcc常用选项