UNIX环境中Real time, User time and Sys time

来源:互联网 发布:优惠券采集网站源码 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/05/20 00:15

    《APUE》上提到了三个时间Real time, User time和Sys time。这三者是什么关系呢?在使用time(1)命令的时候,为什么real time < user time + sys time?(由于笔者的虚拟机为单核,显示的结果不会出现此种情况。附网上看到的一种结果如下:

$ time fooreal        0m0.003suser        0m0.000ssys         0m0.004s$

Real指的是实际经过的时间,User和Sys指的是该进程使用的CPU时间。
1. Real是墙上时间(wall clock time),也就是进程从开始到结束所用的实际时间。这个时间包括其他进程使用的时间片和进程阻塞的时间(比如等待I/O完成)。
2. User指进程执行用户态代码(核心之外)所使用的时间。这是执行此进程所消耗的实际CPU时间,其他进程和此进程阻塞的时间并不包括在内。
3. Sys指进程在内核态消耗的CPU时间,即在内核执行系统调用所使用的CPU时间。

那么,为什么进程开始到结束所经过的时间会比进程所消耗的用户时间和系统时间(user time + sys time)小呢?
User+Sys为进程所使用的实际CPU时间。注意,如果有多个线程,User+Sys的时间有可能大于Real时间。同时,User和Sys时间包括子进程所使用的时间。
time命令的输出数据是由几个不同的系统调用得来的。User time和Sys time从wait(2)或times(2)系统调用(依赖不同的系统)得来。Real time是由gettimeofday(2)中结束时间和起始时间相减得到。不同的操作系统还可能有其他的信息,比如time可以记录上下文切换的次数。
在多处理器的系统上,一个进程如果有多个线程或者有多个子进程可能导致Real time比CPU time(User + Sys time)要小,这是因为不同的线程或进程可以并行执行。

参考:点击打开链接

Real, User and Sys process time statistics

One of these things is not like the other.  Real refers to actual elapsed time; User and Sys refer to CPU time usedonly by the process.

  • Real is wall clock time - time from start to finish of the call.  This is all elapsed time including time slices used by other processes and time the process spends blocked (for example if it is waiting for I/O to complete).

  • User is the amount of CPU time spent in user-mode code (outside the kernel)within the process.  This is only actual CPU time used in executing the process.  Other processes and time the process spends blocked do not count towards this figure.

  • Sys is the amount of CPU time spent in the kernel within the process.  This means executing CPU time spent in system callswithin the kernel, as opposed to library code, which is still running in user-space.  Like 'user', this is only CPU time used by the process.  See below for a brief description of kernel mode (also known as 'supervisor' mode) and the system call mechanism.

User+Sys will tell you how much actual CPU time your process used.  Note that this is across all CPUs, so if the process has multiple threads it could potentially exceed the wall clock time reported byReal.  Note that in the output these figures include the User andSys time of all child processes as well, although the underlying system calls return the statistics for the process and its children separately.

Origins of the statistics reported by time (1)

The statistics reported by time are gathered from various system calls.  'User' and 'Sys' come fromwait (2) or times (2), depending on the particular system.  'Real' is calculated from a start and end time gathered from thegettimeofday (2) call.  Depending on the version of the system, various other statistics such as the number of context switches may also be gathered bytime.

On a multi-processor machine a multi-threaded process or a process forking children could have an elapsed time smaller than the total CPU time - as different threads or processes may run in parallel.  Also, the time statistics reported come from different origins, so times recorded for very short running tasks may be subject to rounding errors, as the example given by the original poster shows.

A brief primer on Kernel vs. User mode

On unix, or any protected-memory operating system, 'Kernel' or 'Supervisor' mode refers to a privileged mode that the CPU can operate in.  Certain privileged actions that could affect security or stability can only be done when the CPU is operating in this mode; these actions are not available to application code.  An example of such an action might be to manipulate the MMU to gain access to the address space of another process.  Normally, user-mode code cannot do this (with good reason), although it can request shared memory from the kernel, which could be read or written by more than one process.  In this case, the shared memory is explicitly requested from the kernel through a secure mechansm and both processes have to explicitly attach to it in order to use it.

The privileged mode is usually referred to as 'kernel' mode because the kernel is executed by the CPU running in this mode.  In order to switch to kernel mode you have to issue a specific instruction (often called atrap) that switches the CPU to running in kernel modeand runs code from a specific location held in a jump table.  For security reasons, you cannot switch to kernel mode and execute arbitrary code - the traps are managed through a table of addresses that cannot be written to unless the CPU is running in supervisor mode.  You trap with an explicit trap number and the address is looked up in the jump table; the kernel has a finite number of controlled entry points.

The 'system' calls in the C libary (particularly those described in Section 2 of the man pages) have a user-mode component, which is what you actually call from your C program.  Behind the scenes they may issue one or more system calls to the kernel to do specific services such as I/O, but they still also have code running in user-mode.  It is also quite possible to directly issue a trap to kernel mode from any user space code if desired, although you may need to write a snippet of assembly language to set up the registers correctly for the call.  A page describing the system calls provided by the Linux kernel and the conventions for setting up registers can be foundhere.

Added by Vilx-

To clarify about 'sys': There are things that your code cannot do from user mode - things like allocating memory or accessing hardware (HDD, network, etc.) These are under the supervision of The Kernel, and he alone can do them. Some operations that you do (like malloc or fread/fwrite) will invoke these Kernel functions and that then will count as 'sys' time. Unfortunately it's not as simple as "every call to malloc will be counted in 'sys' time". The call to malloc will do some processing of its own (still counted in 'user' time) and then somewhere along the way call the function in kernel (counted in 'sys' time). After returning from the kernel call there will be some more time in 'user' and then malloc will return to your code. When the switch happens and how much of it is spent in kernel mode - you cannot say. It depends on the implementation of the library. Also, other seemingly innocent functions might also use malloc and the like in the background, which will again have some time in 'sys' then.