共享池中的Latch争用

来源:互联网 发布:淘宝买二手苹果可靠吗 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/04/29 04:10
共享池中的Latch争用

共享池中如果存在大量的SQL被反复分析,就会造成很大的Latch争用和长时间的等待,最常见到的现象是没有绑定变量。最常见的几种共享池里的Latch是:
 SQL> select * from v$latchname where name like 'library cache%'
  2  ;

    LATCH# NAME                                                     HASH
---------- -------------------------------------------------- ----------
       215 library cache                                      3055961779
       216 library cache lock                                  916468430
       217 library cache pin                                  2802704141
       218 library cache pin allocation                       4107073322
       219 library cache lock allocation                      3971284477
       220 library cache load lock                            2952162927
       221 library cache hash chains                          1130479025

7 rows selected.
在分析系统性能时,如果看到有library cache这样的Latch争用,就可以断定是共享池中出现了问题,这种问题基本上是由SQL语句导致的,比如没有绑定变量或者一些存储过程被反复分析。

下面是来自asktom.oracle.com网站上给出的一个在有绑定变量和不绑定变量情况下,latch资源争用的对比测试,测试是让一条SQL语句执行10 000次,然后给出各自的执行过程中产生的资源使用情况。

SQL>create user test identified by test default tablespace users ;

User created.

SQL>grant dba to test;

Grant succeeded.

SQL> grant select on sys.v_$statname to test;

Grant succeeded.

SQL> grant select on sys.v_$mystat to test;

Grant succeeded.

SQL> grant select on sys.v_$latch to test;

Grant succeeded.


SQL> grant select on sys.v_$timer to test;

Grant succeeded.

SQL>conn test/test

Connected.

SQL> create global temporary table run_stats
     ( runid varchar2(15),
       name varchar2(80),
       value int )
    on commit preserve rows;

Table created.

SQL> create or replace view stats
  2   as select 'STAT...' || a.name name, b.value
  3  from v$statname a, v$mystat b
  4  where a.statistic# = b.statistic#
  5  union all
  6  select 'LATCH.' || name,  gets
  7  from v$latch
  8  union all
  9  select 'STAT...Elapsed Time', hsecs from v$timer;
 
View created

SQL> create or replace package runstats_pkg
  2  as
  3  procedure rs_start;
  4  procedure rs_middle;
  5  procedure rs_stop( p_difference_threshold in number default 0 );
  6  end;
  7  /
 
Package created

SQL> create or replace package body runstats_pkg as
  g_start number;
  g_run1  number;
  g_run2  number;
  procedure rs_start is
  begin
    delete from run_stats;
    insert into run_stats
      select 'before', stats.* from stats;
    g_start := dbms_utility.get_time;
  end;
  procedure rs_middle is
  begin
    g_run1 := (dbms_utility.get_time - g_start);
    insert into run_stats
      select 'after 1', stats.* from stats;
    g_start := dbms_utility.get_time;
  end;
  procedure rs_stop(p_difference_threshold in number default 0) is
  begin
    g_run2 := (dbms_utility.get_time - g_start);
    dbms_output.put_line('Run1 ran in ' || g_run1 || ' hsecs');
    dbms_output.put_line('Run2 ran in ' || g_run2 || ' hsecs');
    if (g_run2 <> 0) then
      dbms_output.put_line('run 1 ran in ' ||
                           round(g_run1 / g_run2 * 100, 2) ||
                           '% of the time');
    end if;
    dbms_output.put_line(chr(9));
    insert into run_stats
      select 'after 2', stats.* from stats;
    dbms_output.put_line(rpad('Name', 30) || lpad('Run1', 12) ||
                         lpad('Run2', 12) || lpad('Diff', 12));
    for x in (select rpad(a.name, 30) ||
                     to_char(b.value - a.value, '999,999,999') ||
                     to_char(c.value - b.value, '999,999,999') ||
                     to_char(((c.value - b.value) - (b.value - a.value)),
                             '999,999,999') data
                from run_stats a, run_stats b, run_stats c
               where a.name = b.name
                 and b.name = c.name
                 and a.runid = 'before'
                 and b.runid = 'after 1'
                 and c.runid = 'after 2'
                    -- and (c.value-a.value) > 0
                 and abs((c.value - b.value) - (b.value - a.value)) >
                     p_difference_threshold
               order by abs((c.value - b.value) - (b.value - a.value))) loop
      dbms_output.put_line(x.data);
    end loop;
    dbms_output.put_line(chr(9));
    dbms_output.put_line('Run1 latches total versus runs -- difference and pct');
    dbms_output.put_line(lpad('Run1', 12) || lpad('Run2', 12) ||
                         lpad('Diff', 12) || lpad('Pct', 10));
    for x in (select to_char(run1, '999,999,999') ||
                     to_char(run2, '999,999,999') ||
                     to_char(diff, '999,999,999') ||
                     to_char(round(run1 /
                                   decode(run2, 0, to_number(0), run2) * 100,
                                   2),
                             '99,999.99') || '%' data
                from (select sum(b.value - a.value) run1,
                             sum(c.value - b.value) run2,
                              sum((c.value - b.value) - (b.value - a.value)) diff
                        from run_stats a, run_stats b, run_stats c
                       where a.name = b.name
                         and b.name = c.name
                         and a.runid = 'before'
                         and b.runid = 'after 1'
                         and c.runid = 'after 2'
                         and a.name like 'LATCH%')) loop
      dbms_output.put_line(x.data);
    end loop;
  end;
end;
/

Package body created.

SQL>

上面的操作是创建一个测试环境,包括创建用户、相关表,以及一个捕获SQL执行中的统计数据的存储过程。
下面开始做测试对比,先创建一个表T用于插入数据:
SQL> create table t ( x int );
 
Table created

创建第一个存储过程p1,不使用变量绑定方式执行SQL 10 000次:

SQL> create or replace procedure p1 as
  2    l_cnt number;
  3  begin
  4    for i in 1 .. 10000 loop
  5      execute immediate 'select count(*) from t where x = ' || i
  6        into l_cnt;
  7    end loop;
  8  end;
  9  /
 
Procedure created

创建第二个存储过程p2,使用变量绑定方式执行SQL 10000次:

SQL> create or replace procedure p2 as
  2    l_cnt number;
  3  begin
  4    for i in 1 .. 10000 loop
  5      select count(*) into l_cnt from t where x = i;
  6    end loop;
  7  end;
  8  /
 
Procedure created

SQL> exec runStats_pkg.rs_start;
 
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

SQL> exec p1
 
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

SQL> exec runStats_pkg.rs_middle
 
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

SQL> exec p2
 
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

SQL> exec runStats_pkg.rs_stop(1000)
 
Run1 ran in 6705 hsecs
Run2 ran in 2851 hsecs
run 1 ran in 235.18% of the time
    
Name                                  Run1        Run2        Diff
STAT...table fetch by rowid          1,327          52      -1,275
STAT...no work - consistent re       1,952          75      -1,877
STAT...consistent gets - exami       1,978          55      -1,923
STAT...redo size                     5,120       3,144      -1,976
STAT...buffer is not pinned co       2,801         108      -2,693
STAT...sorts (rows)                  6,740       3,530      -3,210
STAT...Elapsed Time                  6,713       2,853      -3,860
STAT...parse count (hard)           10,091           4     -10,087
STAT...sql area evicted             10,150           4     -10,146
STAT...enqueue requests             10,393           6     -10,387
STAT...enqueue releases             10,393           5     -10,388
STAT...parse count (total)          10,440          45     -10,395
STAT...calls to get snapshot s      50,999      40,040     -10,959
STAT...consistent gets              43,970      30,137     -13,833
STAT...consistent gets from ca      43,970      30,137     -13,833
STAT...session logical reads        44,018      30,168     -13,850
LATCH.session allocation            31,538      15,548     -15,990
LATCH.enqueue hash chains           21,783         721     -21,062
LATCH.enqueues                      21,739         648     -21,091
LATCH.cache buffers chains          88,391      66,216     -22,175
STAT...recursive calls              33,554      10,367     -23,187
STAT...session uga memory max      334,528     306,904     -27,624
LATCH.library cache pin             61,192         706     -60,486
LATCH.library cache lock            62,195       1,426     -60,769
LATCH.kks stats                     65,464         359     -65,105
LATCH.row cache objects            160,611       4,056    -156,555
LATCH.shared pool simulator        177,211      11,445    -165,766
LATCH.library cache                224,449       3,175    -221,274
 
begin runStats_pkg.rs_stop(1000); end;
 
ORA-20000: ORU-10027: buffer overflow, limit of 2000 bytes
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 32
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 97
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 112
ORA-06512: at "TEST.RUNSTATS_PKG", line 49
ORA-06512: at line 2
 
SQL> set   serveroutput   on   size   1000000
SQL>  exec runStats_pkg.rs_stop(1000)
 
Run1 ran in 6705 hsecs
Run2 ran in 13459 hsecs
run 1 ran in 49.82% of the time
    
Name                                  Run1        Run2        Diff
STAT...table fetch by rowid          1,327          52      -1,275
LATCH.SQL memory manager worka       1,532       3,145       1,613
STAT...undo change vector size       2,792       4,480       1,688
STAT...no work - consistent re       1,952         161      -1,791
STAT...redo size                     5,120       7,008       1,888
STAT...consistent gets - exami       1,978          60      -1,918
STAT...buffer is not pinned co       2,801         108      -2,693
STAT...Elapsed Time                  6,713      13,461       6,748
STAT...sorts (rows)                  6,740      14,065       7,325
STAT...bytes sent via SQL*Net        2,344       9,691       7,347
LATCH.cache buffers chains          88,391      79,727      -8,664
STAT...parse count (hard)           10,091           8     -10,083
STAT...sql area evicted             10,150          23     -10,127
STAT...parse count (total)          10,440          90     -10,350
STAT...enqueue requests             10,393          11     -10,382
STAT...enqueue releases             10,393          10     -10,383
STAT...calls to get snapshot s      50,999      40,062     -10,937
STAT...bytes received via SQL*       2,700      14,269      11,569
LATCH.session allocation            31,538      44,001      12,463
STAT...session logical reads        44,018      30,342     -13,676
STAT...consistent gets from ca      43,970      30,253     -13,717
STAT...consistent gets              43,970      30,253     -13,717
STAT...table scan rows gotten          202      13,950      13,748
LATCH.enqueue hash chains           21,783       2,442     -19,341
LATCH.enqueues                      21,739       2,249     -19,490
STAT...recursive calls              33,554      10,383     -23,171
LATCH.library cache lock            62,195       3,158     -59,037
LATCH.library cache pin             61,192       1,593     -59,599
LATCH.kks stats                     65,464         888     -64,576
LATCH.row cache objects            160,611      11,034    -149,577
LATCH.shared pool simulator        177,211      13,398    -163,813
LATCH.library cache                224,449       7,511    -216,938
STAT...physical write total by     229,376           0    -229,376
LATCH.shared pool                  339,188      14,216    -324,972
STAT...session uga memory          334,528      -7,328    -341,856
STAT...physical read bytes         811,008           0    -811,008
STAT...session uga memory max      334,528   1,446,296   1,111,768
STAT...physical read total byt   1,302,528           0  -1,302,528
STAT...session pga memory          851,968    -524,288  -1,376,256
STAT...session pga memory max    1,900,544     327,680  -1,572,864
    
Run1 latches total versus runs -- difference and pct
        Run1        Run2        Diff       Pct
   1,259,598     190,572  -1,069,026    660.96%
 
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

测试创建的性能采集包 runStats_pkg 分别在测试开始、存储过程p1运行结束、存储过程p2运行结束的3个时间点采集了性能数据,最后在报告中给出了2个存储过程各自的latch资源使用情况及对比情况。从这个结果中可以清楚地看到不绑定变量的Latch争用是非常严重的,请大家注意输出结果中几个library cache的Latch在数值的差异,可以看到,绑定变量时要比不绑定变量时这些Latch争用小得多。
如果你的数据库存在这几种Latch争用,大多数时候要考察你的系统的SQL变量绑定情况。
关于如何确定系统中是否存在绑定变量的情况,ASKTOM网站也提供了一个不错的函数remove_constans()来检查共享池中的SQL的运行情况。
首先创建一个表,用于存放整理过的数据:
SQL> create table t1 as select sql_text from v$sqlarea;
 
Table created

给表增加一个字段:

SQL> alter table t1 add sql_text_wo_constants varchar2(1000);
 
Table altered

创建函数remove_constants:

create or replace function
remove_constants( p_query in varchar2 ) return varchar2
as
    l_query long;
    l_char  varchar2(1);
    l_in_quotes boolean default FALSE;
begin
    for i in 1 .. length( p_query )
    loop
        l_char := substr(p_query,i,1);
        if ( l_char = '''' and l_in_quotes )
        then
            l_in_quotes := FALSE;
        elsif ( l_char = '''' and NOT l_in_quotes )
        then
            l_in_quotes := TRUE;
            l_query := l_query || '''#';
        end if;
        if ( NOT l_in_quotes ) then
            l_query := l_query || l_char;
        end if;
    end loop;
    l_query := translate( l_query, '0123456789', '@@@@@@@@@@' );
    for i in 0 .. 8 loop
        l_query := replace( l_query, lpad('@',10-i,'@'), '@' );
        l_query := replace( l_query, lpad(' ',10-i,' '), ' ' );
    end loop;
    return upper(l_query);
end;

/

下面是如何使用这个函数。
将v$sql视图中的数据用remove_constants处理后,更新到t1表中:
SQL> update t1 set sql_text_wo_constants = remove_constants(sql_text);
 
649 rows updated

查出除了谓词条件不同的SQL语句和它们的执行次数,在这里是查询SQL没有被重用超过100次的SQL语句:

select sql_text_wo_constants, count(*)  from t1  group by sql_text_wo_constants having count(*) > 100  order by 2;

/

以下是一个测试的例子,我们使用一个循环执行1000次某条SQL,每次执行时只有谓词不同:

SQL> begin
  2    for i in 1 .. 1000 loop
  3      execute immediate  'select count(*) from t where x = ' || i;
  4    end loop;
  5  end;
  6  /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed

SQL> select sql_text_wo_constants, count(*)
  2    from t1
  3   group by sql_text_wo_constants
  4  having count(*) > 100 ---可以修改成你希望的次数
  5   order by 2
  6  ;
 
SQL_TEXT_WO_CONSTANTS                                                              COUNT(*)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

SELECT * FROM T WHERE X=@

       1000
 

可以看到输出结果中,这条语句被执行了1000次,其中谓词条件被“@”代替,这样通过这个函数,可以很容易地找到共享池中哪些SQL没有绑定变量。

整理之网络

原创粉丝点击