RFC79 圆木协议错误

组织：中国互动出版网（<http://www.china-pub.com/>）RFC文档中文翻译计划（http://www.china-pub.com/compters/emook/aboutemook.htm <http://www.china-pub.com/>）E-mail：[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>译者：董苛（cnchris    [e-mail]）译文发布时间：2001-10-1版权：本中文翻译文档版权归中国互动出版网所有。可以用于非商业用途自由转载，但必须保留本文档的翻译及版权信息。Network Working Group                                Edwin W. Meyer, Jr.Request for Comments: 79                                 MIT Project MACNIC 5601                                               November 16, 1970                             日志协议错误                         Logger Protocol Error    Steve Crocker最近发现了一个冲突，是一号协议文献中描述的正式的NCP协议和在RFC 66中描述的日志协议之间的冲突。Steve建议发表一则RFC，来对网络社区声名这一点。    在RFC66中建议道，在RTS或STR请求后紧跟一个ALL定位命令以进行连接。这与一号协议文献中陈述的有关ALL命令只能用于“开放式”连接的限制产生了冲突。    在连接建立起来之前不要求处理ALL命令是一个简化了的限制，NCP的实施有可能会利用这一点。例如，多路NCP目前就是这么设计的。因为这个原因，也因为我们认为除了有严重的错误外，NCP协议都不能有所改动，所以提出的日志协议需要做出修改，以吻合现有的NCP协议。         [ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ]       [ into the online RFC archives by Alison De La Cruz  11/00  ]版权说明   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.致谢Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.