深入浅出SharePoint—第三方工作流引擎对比
来源:互联网 发布:有约束条件的优化问题 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/05 16:31
But in general I can post thepros and cons of K2,Nintex as follows
· 1)K2 appears to havethe most mature products. Both are quite pricy, though they aresupposedly reworking their cost model. Their blackpearl product is atrimmed down version that focuses on SharePoint integration, so hooking intoother LOB systems will be limited, but still possible. Allowing theworkflow engine to be separated from the wss front end server, not so inNintex.
· 2)Nintex appears tobe a step up from SPD 2007 and 2010. Compared to K2 blackpoint (theirSharePoint/Nintex competitor price wise) Nintex has some Active Directory andExchange actions that could come in handy for provisioning new staff.
· 3)K2 has an upgradepath to their blackpearl full product, which provides an environment/api forcreating custom enterprise data connectors so your workflows canintegrate with any system. Nintex has an api for developing customactions, though not as completely defined.
4)K2 has AD and Exchange integration today (for read and emailpurposes ) but just announced rich extended AD and Exchange integration (seehttp://www.k2.com/en/blackpearl.aspx -Look in "whats coming" TAB) in addition to lots of othercapabilities.
5)K2provides a range of visual designers (from one built on Silverlight 4 andembedded into SharePoint to a standalone designer and one fully integrated withVisual Studio (2008 and 2010), a very rich "sharepoint integrated "process management capability called Process Portals and rich out of boxreports and analytics.
6)K2 alsohas amazing Infopath Integration and fully manages Forms and Process versioningand lifecycles , something critical to any process requiring Infopath.
7)K2 alsoadds some really important workflow fundamentals out of the box. SharePointDesigner is a cool tool, but you will very quickly run out of steam, especiallywhen you have to think about issues like how to "go back to a previousstep (one or more steps back) in the process (eg a re-work capability)"and do this at multiple places in the process. Many real-life humanworkflow processes require this ability . Just three other examplesare support for time zones, working hours and rich rules capabilitiesthat are highly extensible through K2 Inline Functions.
- 深入浅出SharePoint—第三方工作流引擎对比
- 三大工作流引擎对比
- 三大工作流引擎对比
- 三大工作流引擎对比
- 三大工作流引擎对比
- SharePoint 2010 Foundare workflow方蝶工作流
- 深入浅出SharePoint—目录
- 第三方支付平台对比
- 第三方分享按钮对比
- sharepoint 第三方工具地址集
- 深入浅出SharePoint——SharePoint补丁纪实
- 深入浅出VC++串口编程--第三方类
- sharepoint 工作流
- 深入浅出SharePoint—部署篇
- 深入浅出SharePoint—创建ContentType
- 第三方图片加载框架对比分析
- iOS界面约束第三方框架对比
- 第三方免费加固横向对比
- mysql insert的几点操作(DELAYED 、IGNORE、ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE )
- 使用java BufferedWriter写信息到文件中带自动换行
- ios UIScrollView 创建多图像分页滚动
- javascript动态指定action多按钮提交同一form
- 快排
- 深入浅出SharePoint—第三方工作流引擎对比
- Jquery Easy UI Databox 用法
- 财务中以dialog的方式配置
- <context-param>与<init-param>的区别与作用含与Spring整合时的文件配置
- java实现的简单词法分析器
- 关于org.hibernate.exception.SQLGrammarException: could not insert:
- scala lift环境搭建(9)
- 动画那点事 UIKit, CoreGraphics
- 关于在 KEIL C51 中嵌入汇编以及C51与A51间的相互调用