chromium Callback 部分翻译

来源:互联网 发布:淘宝怎么能提高流量 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/05/15 23:53
// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------// Introduction// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------//// The templated Callback class is a generalized function object. Together// with the Bind() function in bind.h, they provide a type-safe method for// performing partial application of functions.// 这个Callback模板类是一个普通的函数对象(注意不是函数定义是对象/实例),一般与Bind函数一起使用,// 他们为局部函数或局部类成员函数提供一种类型安全的访问机制。// Partial application (or "currying") is the process of binding a subset of// a function's arguments to produce another function that takes fewer// arguments. This can be used to pass around a unit of delayed execution,// much like lexical closures are used in other languages. For example, it// is used in Chromium code to schedule tasks on different MessageLoops.// 局部化应用是这样的一个处理过程:绑定一个函数的参数的子集,生成一个需要更少参数的函数供人使用// 可以用于传递一个延迟执行的单元,类似于其他语言中的闭包的功能。// pointer A;// function funA(A a){ a->dosomething();}// function funACallback(){a->dosomething();} //其他应用程序不知道有a这个实例,只需要直接调用funACallback()//// A callback with no unbound input parameters (base::Callback<void(void)>)// is called a base::Closure. Note that this is NOT the same as what other// languages refer to as a closure -- it does not retain a reference to its// enclosing environment.// 没有任何参数和返回值的Callback实例,叫做base::Closure(上面举的例子funACallback()就是)//  base::Callback<void(void)> 等于 base::Closure//// MEMORY MANAGEMENT AND PASSING//// The Callback objects themselves should be passed by const-reference, and// stored by copy. They internally store their state via a refcounted class// and thus do not need to be deleted.// // The reason to pass via a const-reference is to avoid unnecessary// AddRef/Release pairs to the internal state.// Callback实例都是值引用的,这样可以减少使用引用计数的麻烦//// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------// Quick reference for basic stuff// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------//// BINDING A BARE FUNCTION 绑定一个普通的函数////   int Return5() { return 5; }//   base::Callback<int(void)> func_cb = base::Bind(&Return5);//   LOG(INFO) << func_cb.Run();  // Prints 5.//// BINDING A CLASS METHOD 绑定一个类的成员函数////   The first argument to bind is the member function to call, the second is//   the object on which to call it.////   class Ref : public base::RefCountedThreadSafe<Ref> {//    public://     int Foo() { return 3; }//     void PrintBye() { LOG(INFO) << "bye."; }//   };//   scoped_refptr<Ref> ref = new Ref();//   base::Callback<void(void)> ref_cb = base::Bind(&Ref::Foo, ref);//   LOG(INFO) << ref_cb.Run();  // Prints out 3.////   By default the object must support RefCounted or you will get a compiler//   error. If you're passing between threads, be sure it's//   RefCountedThreadSafe! See "Advanced binding of member functions" below if//   you don't want to use reference counting.//   被绑定的类实例必须支持RefCounted,否则将会编译不通过,//   如果要跨线程使用,则必须继承RefCountedThreadSafe// // RUNNING A CALLBACK////   Callbacks can be run with their "Run" method, which has the same//   signature as the template argument to the callback.//   要运行Callback可以直接调用它们的Run方法,如果有参数当然要传递参数给它,//   参数跟模板参数一致,后面还会有这方面的说明////   void DoSomething(const base::Callback<void(int, std::string)>& callback) {//     callback.Run(5, "hello");//   }////   Callbacks can be run more than once (they don't get deleted or marked when//   run). However, this precludes using base::Passed (see below).//   除了使用了base::Passed的Callback之外,其他情况一般来说一个Callback可以运行多次////   void DoSomething(const base::Callback<double(double)>& callback) {//     double myresult = callback.Run(3.14159);//     myresult += callback.Run(2.71828);//   }//// PASSING UNBOUND INPUT PARAMETERS 传入参数////   Unbound parameters are specified at the time a callback is Run(). They are//   specified in the Callback template type:////   void MyFunc(int i, const std::string& str) {}//   base::Callback<void(int, const std::string&)> cb = base::Bind(&MyFunc);//   cb.Run(23, "hello, world");//// PASSING BOUND INPUT PARAMETERS 绑定全部参数//   在绑定的时候设置了参数值的话,调用的时候就不用再传了////   Bound parameters are specified when you create thee callback as arguments//   to Bind(). They will be passed to the function and the Run()ner of the//   callback doesn't see those values or even know that the function it's//   calling.////   void MyFunc(int i, const std::string& str) {}//   base::Callback<void(void)> cb = base::Bind(&MyFunc, 23, "hello world");//   cb.Run();////   A callback with no unbound input parameters (base::Callback<void(void)>)//   is called a base::Closure. So we could have also written:////   base::Closure cb = base::Bind(&MyFunc, 23, "hello world");////   When calling member functions, bound parameters just go after the object//   pointer.如果是成员函数,当前实例的指针一定要绑定,而且是在第二个参数////   base::Closure cb = base::Bind(&MyClass::MyFunc, this, 23, "hello world");//// PARTIAL BINDING OF PARAMETERS 绑定部分参数////   You can specify some parameters when you create the callback, and specify//   the rest when you execute the callback.////   void MyFunc(int i, const std::string& str) {}//   base::Callback<void(const std::string&)> cb = base::Bind(&MyFunc, 23);//   cb.Run("hello world");////   When calling a function bound parameters are first, followed by unbound//   parameters.////// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------// Quick reference for advanced binding// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------//// BINDING A CLASS METHOD WITH WEAK POINTERS// 所谓弱指针,是指这些指针所指向的对象可以已经不存在,已经被销毁// 不过要注意,弱指针不是线程安全的,所以不要再多线程场景下使用////   base::Bind(&MyClass::Foo, GetWeakPtr());////   The callback will not be issued if the object is destroyed at the time//   it's issued. DANGER: weak pointers are not threadsafe, so don't use this//   when passing between threads!//// BINDING A CLASS METHOD WITH MANUAL LIFETIME MANAGEMENT // 绑定自己管理声明周期的对象,你要保证在执行这个callback的时候,这个对象还存在////   base::Bind(&MyClass::Foo, base::Unretained(this));////   This disables all lifetime management on the object. You're responsible//   for making sure the object is alive at the time of the call. You break it,//   you own it!//// BINDING A CLASS METHOD AND HAVING THE CALLBACK OWN THE CLASS// 让绑定的对象跟着Callback对象一起死(销毁~~~),Callback执行之后就无用的对象最适合了////   MyClass* myclass = new MyClass;//   base::Bind(&MyClass::Foo, base::Owned(myclass));////   The object will be deleted when the callback is destroyed, even if it's//   not run (like if you post a task during shutdown). Potentially useful for//   "fire and forget" cases.//// IGNORING RETURN VALUES 如果不关心返回值的话,可以这样绑定////   Sometimes you want to call a function that returns a value in a callback//   that doesn't expect a return value.////   int DoSomething(int arg) { cout << arg << endl; }//   base::Callback<void<int>) cb =//       base::Bind(base::IgnoreResult(&DoSomething));////// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------// Quick reference for binding parameters to Bind()// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------//// Bound parameters are specified as arguments to Bind() and are passed to the// function. A callback with no parameters or no unbound parameters is called a// Closure (base::Callback<void(void)> and base::Closure are the same thing).//// PASSING PARAMETERS OWNED BY THE CALLBACK// ////   void Foo(int* arg) { cout << *arg << endl; }//   int* pn = new int(1);//   base::Closure foo_callback = base::Bind(&foo, base::Owned(pn));////   The parameter will be deleted when the callback is destroyed, even if it's//   not run (like if you post a task during shutdown).//// PASSING PARAMETERS AS A scoped_ptr// 如果想只能运行一次,用scoped_ptr就最适合了,运行后自动设置指针为null,// 没有运行的话Callback销毁时跟着销毁scoped_ptr////   void TakesOwnership(scoped_ptr<Foo> arg) {}//   scoped_ptr<Foo> f(new Foo);//   // f becomes null during the following call.//   base::Closure cb = base::Bind(&TakesOwnership, base::Passed(&f));////   Ownership of the parameter will be with the callback until the it is run,//   when ownership is passed to the callback function. This means the callback//   can only be run once. If the callback is never run, it will delete the//   object when it's destroyed.//// PASSING PARAMETERS AS A scoped_refptr////   void TakesOneRef(scoped_refptr<Foo> arg) {}//   scoped_refptr<Foo> f(new Foo)//   base::Closure cb = base::Bind(&TakesOneRef, f);////   This should "just work." The closure will take a reference as long as it//   is alive, and another reference will be taken for the called function.//// PASSING PARAMETERS BY REFERENCE////   void foo(int arg) { cout << arg << endl }//   int n = 1;//   base::Closure has_ref = base::Bind(&foo, base::ConstRef(n));//   n = 2;//   has_ref.Run();  // Prints "2"////   Normally parameters are copied in the closure. DANGER: ConstRef stores a//   const reference instead, referencing the original parameter. This means//   that you must ensure the object outlives the callback!////// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------// Implementation notes// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------//// WHERE IS THIS DESIGN FROM://// The design Callback and Bind is heavily influenced by C++'s// tr1::function/tr1::bind, and by the "Google Callback" system used inside// Google.////// HOW THE IMPLEMENTATION WORKS://// There are three main components to the system://   1) The Callback classes.//   2) The Bind() functions.//   3) The arguments wrappers (e.g., Unretained() and ConstRef()).//// The Callback classes represent a generic function pointer. Internally,// it stores a refcounted piece of state that represents the target function// and all its bound parameters.  Each Callback specialization has a templated// constructor that takes an BindState<>*.  In the context of the constructor,// the static type of this BindState<> pointer uniquely identifies the// function it is representing, all its bound parameters, and a Run() method// that is capable of invoking the target.//// Callback's constructor takes the BindState<>* that has the full static type// and erases the target function type as well as the types of the bound// parameters.  It does this by storing a pointer to the specific Run()// function, and upcasting the state of BindState<>* to a// BindStateBase*. This is safe as long as this BindStateBase pointer// is only used with the stored Run() pointer.//// To BindState<> objects are created inside the Bind() functions.// These functions, along with a set of internal templates, are responsible for////  - Unwrapping the function signature into return type, and parameters//  - Determining the number of parameters that are bound//  - Creating the BindState storing the bound parameters//  - Performing compile-time asserts to avoid error-prone behavior//  - Returning an Callback<> with an arity matching the number of unbound//    parameters and that knows the correct refcounting semantics for the//    target object if we are binding a method.//// The Bind functions do the above using type-inference, and template// specializations.//// By default Bind() will store copies of all bound parameters, and attempt// to refcount a target object if the function being bound is a class method.// These copies are created even if the function takes parameters as const// references. (Binding to non-const references is forbidden, see bind.h.)//// To change this behavior, we introduce a set of argument wrappers// (e.g., Unretained(), and ConstRef()).  These are simple container templates// that are passed by value, and wrap a pointer to argument.  See the// file-level comment in base/bind_helpers.h for more info.//// These types are passed to the Unwrap() functions, and the MaybeRefcount()// functions respectively to modify the behavior of Bind().  The Unwrap()// and MaybeRefcount() functions change behavior by doing partial// specialization based on whether or not a parameter is a wrapper type.//// ConstRef() is similar to tr1::cref.  Unretained() is specific to Chromium.////// WHY NOT TR1 FUNCTION/BIND?//// Direct use of tr1::function and tr1::bind was considered, but ultimately// rejected because of the number of copy constructors invocations involved// in the binding of arguments during construction, and the forwarding of// arguments during invocation.  These copies will no longer be an issue in// C++0x because C++0x will support rvalue reference allowing for the compiler// to avoid these copies.  However, waiting for C++0x is not an option.//// Measured with valgrind on gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5), the// tr1::bind call itself will invoke a non-trivial copy constructor three times// for each bound parameter.  Also, each when passing a tr1::function, each// bound argument will be copied again.//// In addition to the copies taken at binding and invocation, copying a// tr1::function causes a copy to be made of all the bound parameters and// state.//// Furthermore, in Chromium, it is desirable for the Callback to take a// reference on a target object when representing a class method call.  This// is not supported by tr1.//// Lastly, tr1::function and tr1::bind has a more general and flexible API.// This includes things like argument reordering by use of// tr1::bind::placeholder, support for non-const reference parameters, and some// limited amount of subtyping of the tr1::function object (e.g.,// tr1::function<int(int)> is convertible to tr1::function<void(int)>).//// These are not features that are required in Chromium. Some of them, such as// allowing for reference parameters, and subtyping of functions, may actually// become a source of errors. Removing support for these features actually// allows for a simpler implementation, and a terser Currying API.////// WHY NOT GOOGLE CALLBACKS?//// The Google callback system also does not support refcounting.  Furthermore,// its implementation has a number of strange edge cases with respect to type// conversion of its arguments.  In particular, the argument's constness must// at times match exactly the function signature, or the type-inference might// break.  Given the above, writing a custom solution was easier.////// MISSING FUNCTIONALITY//  - Invoking the return of Bind.  Bind(&foo).Run() does not work;//  - Binding arrays to functions that take a non-const pointer.//    Example://      void Foo(const char* ptr);//      void Bar(char* ptr);//      Bind(&Foo, "test");//      Bind(&Bar, "test");  // This fails because ptr is not const.


 

原创粉丝点击