keepalive

In libvirt, it's perfectly possible and widely used to have disabledtimers (timeout=-1) and fire them up 'randomly' with timeout=0.However, with current mapping into glib mainloop it's not possibleand causing troubles. 

--- libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) 

diff --git a/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c b/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.cindex 94f4de8..c3eb3c8 100644--- a/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c+++ b/libvirt-glib/libvirt-glib-event.c 

@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ 

gvir_event_timeout_update(int timer, if (interval >= 0) { 

 if (data->source) 

- goto cleanup; 

+ g_source_remove(data->source); 

 data->interval = interval; data->source = g_timeout_add(data->interval, 

-- 1.7.8.5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819617https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-May/msg01157.htmlhttp://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-June/msg00445.html