MySQL锁阻塞分析

来源:互联网 发布:mac上能玩什么网游 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/13 03:03

日常维护中,经常会碰到线程被阻塞,导致数据库响应非常慢,下面就看看如何获取是哪个线程导致了阻塞的。

blog地址:http://blog.csdn.net/hw_libo/article/details/39080809

1. 环境说明

RHEL 6.4 x86_64 + MySQL 5.6.19
事务隔离级别:RR

2. 测试过程



3. 查看锁阻塞线程信息

这里用几中方法进行分析:

3.1  使用show processlist查看

MySQL [(none)]> show processlist;+----+------+-----------+------+---------+------+--------------+------------------------------------------+| Id | User | Host      | db   | Command | Time | State        | Info                                     |+----+------+-----------+------+---------+------+--------------+------------------------------------------+|  2 | root | localhost | NULL | Query   |    0 | init         | show processlist                         ||  3 | root | localhost | test | Query   |   70 | Sending data | select count(*) from t3 a,t3 b           ||  4 | root | localhost | test | Query   |   65 | updating     | delete from emp where empno=7788         ||  7 | root | localhost | test | Query   |   68 | updating     | update emp set sal=3500 where empno=7788 |+----+------+-----------+------+---------+------+--------------+------------------------------------------+4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

如果数据库存在较多线程的话,这种方法确实不太好确认的。


3.2  直接使用show engine innodb status查看

------------TRANSACTIONS------------Trx id counter 4131Purge done for trx's n:o < 4119 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idleHistory list length 126LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION:---TRANSACTION 0, not startedMySQL thread id 2, OS thread handle 0x7f953ffff700, query id 115 localhost root initshow engine innodb status---TRANSACTION 4130, ACTIVE 41 sec starting index readmysql tables in use 1, locked 1LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 4, OS thread handle 0x7f953ff9d700, query id 112 localhost root updatingdelete from emp where empno=7788------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 41 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:   ## 等待了41sRECORD LOCKS space id 16 page no 3 n bits 88 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`emp` trx id 4130 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waitingRecord lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 10; compact format; info bits 0  ## 线程4在等待往test.emp中的主键上加X锁,page num=3 0: len 4; hex 80001e6c; asc    l;; 1: len 6; hex 000000001018; asc       ;; 2: len 7; hex 91000001420084; asc     B  ;; 3: len 5; hex 53434f5454; asc SCOTT;; 4: len 7; hex 414e414c595354; asc ANALYST;; 5: len 4; hex 80001d8e; asc     ;; 6: len 4; hex 208794f0; asc     ;; 7: len 4; hex 80000bb8; asc     ;; 8: SQL NULL; 9: len 4; hex 80000014; asc     ;;---------------------TRANSACTION 4129, ACTIVE 45 sec starting index readmysql tables in use 1, locked 1LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 7, OS thread handle 0x7f953ff6c700, query id 111 localhost root updatingupdate emp set sal=3500 where empno=7788------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 45 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:   ## 等待了45sRECORD LOCKS space id 16 page no 3 n bits 88 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`emp` trx id 4129 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waitingRecord lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 10; compact format; info bits 0  ## 线程7在等待往test.emp中的主键上加X锁,page num=3 0: len 4; hex 80001e6c; asc    l;; 1: len 6; hex 000000001018; asc       ;; 2: len 7; hex 91000001420084; asc     B  ;; 3: len 5; hex 53434f5454; asc SCOTT;; 4: len 7; hex 414e414c595354; asc ANALYST;; 5: len 4; hex 80001d8e; asc     ;; 6: len 4; hex 208794f0; asc     ;; 7: len 4; hex 80000bb8; asc     ;; 8: SQL NULL; 9: len 4; hex 80000014; asc     ;;---------------------TRANSACTION 4128, ACTIVE 51 sec2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 3, OS thread handle 0x7f953ffce700, query id 110 localhost root cleaning up

我们知道,主要根因还是thread=3引起的,但从innodb status中却无法分析得到这个结果。

从上面来看,线程4和线程7都在等待往test.emp中的主键上加X锁,page num=3,但是线程7等待的时间为45s,而线程4等待的时间为41s,是较线程7之后申请的锁,所以可以判断是线程7阻塞了线程4。至于线程7为什么出现等待,这里分析不到根因。


3.3  使用mysqladmin debug查看

# mysqladmin -S /tmp/mysql3306.sock debug

然后在error日志中,会看到:

Thread database.table_name          Locked/Waiting        Lock_type3       test.t3                     Locked - read         Low priority read lock7       test.emp                    Locked - write        High priority write lock

这种方法中,能找到线程ID=3和7是阻塞者,但还是不太准确,判断不出来线程7也是被线程ID=3阻塞的。


3.4  使用innodb_lock_monitor来获取阻塞锁线程

MySQL [test]> CREATE TABLE innodb_lock_monitor (a INT) ENGINE=INNODB;  ## 随便在一个数据库中创建这个表,就会打开lock monitorQuery OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.07 sec)MySQL [test]> show warnings\G*************************** 1. row ***************************  Level: Warning   Code: 131Message: Using the table name innodb_lock_monitor to enable diagnostic output is deprecated and may be removed in future releases. Use INFORMATION_SCHEMA or PERFORMANCE_SCHEMA tables or SET GLOBAL innodb_status_output=ON.1 row in set (0.00 sec)

说明:这个在5.6中有一个warning,但不影响使用。

然后再使用show engine innodb status查看:

------------TRANSACTIONS------------Trx id counter 4667Purge done for trx's n:o < 4659 undo n:o < 0 state: running but idleHistory list length 138LIST OF TRANSACTIONS FOR EACH SESSION:---TRANSACTION 0, not startedMySQL thread id 9, OS thread handle 0x7f813c5f7700, query id 152 localhost root initshow engine innodb status---TRANSACTION 4663, ACTIVE 78 sec starting index readmysql tables in use 1, locked 1LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 4, OS thread handle 0x7f813c628700, query id 149 localhost root updatingdelete from emp where empno=7788------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 78 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:   ## 等待了78sRECORD LOCKS space id 16 page no 3 n bits 88 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`emp` trx id 4663 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waitingRecord lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 10; compact format; info bits 0  ## 线程4在等待往test.emp中的主键上加X锁,page num=3 0: len 4; hex 80001e6c; asc    l;; 1: len 6; hex 000000001018; asc       ;; 2: len 7; hex 91000001420084; asc     B  ;; 3: len 5; hex 53434f5454; asc SCOTT;; 4: len 7; hex 414e414c595354; asc ANALYST;; 5: len 4; hex 80001d8e; asc     ;; 6: len 4; hex 208794f0; asc     ;; 7: len 4; hex 80000bb8; asc     ;; 8: SQL NULL; 9: len 4; hex 80000014; asc     ;;------------------TABLE LOCK table `test`.`emp` trx id 4663 lock mode IX   ## 在给主键行上加X锁之前,先要在表上加意向锁IXRECORD LOCKS space id 16 page no 3 n bits 88 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`emp` trx id 4663 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waitingRecord lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 10; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80001e6c; asc    l;; 1: len 6; hex 000000001018; asc       ;; 2: len 7; hex 91000001420084; asc     B  ;; 3: len 5; hex 53434f5454; asc SCOTT;; 4: len 7; hex 414e414c595354; asc ANALYST;; 5: len 4; hex 80001d8e; asc     ;; 6: len 4; hex 208794f0; asc     ;; 7: len 4; hex 80000bb8; asc     ;; 8: SQL NULL; 9: len 4; hex 80000014; asc     ;;---TRANSACTION 4662, ACTIVE 81 sec starting index readmysql tables in use 1, locked 1LOCK WAIT 2 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 7, OS thread handle 0x7f813c5c6700, query id 148 localhost root updatingupdate emp set sal=3500 where empno=7788------- TRX HAS BEEN WAITING 81 SEC FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:  ## 等待了81sRECORD LOCKS space id 16 page no 3 n bits 88 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`emp` trx id 4662 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waitingRecord lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 10; compact format; info bits 0  ## 线程7在等待往test.emp中的主键上加X锁,page num=3 0: len 4; hex 80001e6c; asc    l;; 1: len 6; hex 000000001018; asc       ;; 2: len 7; hex 91000001420084; asc     B  ;; 3: len 5; hex 53434f5454; asc SCOTT;; 4: len 7; hex 414e414c595354; asc ANALYST;; 5: len 4; hex 80001d8e; asc     ;; 6: len 4; hex 208794f0; asc     ;; 7: len 4; hex 80000bb8; asc     ;; 8: SQL NULL; 9: len 4; hex 80000014; asc     ;;------------------TABLE LOCK table `test`.`emp` trx id 4662 lock mode IX   ## 在给主键行上加X锁之前,先要在表上加意向锁IXRECORD LOCKS space id 16 page no 3 n bits 88 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`emp` trx id 4662 lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waitingRecord lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 10; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80001e6c; asc    l;; 1: len 6; hex 000000001018; asc       ;; 2: len 7; hex 91000001420084; asc     B  ;; 3: len 5; hex 53434f5454; asc SCOTT;; 4: len 7; hex 414e414c595354; asc ANALYST;; 5: len 4; hex 80001d8e; asc     ;; 6: len 4; hex 208794f0; asc     ;; 7: len 4; hex 80000bb8; asc     ;; 8: SQL NULL; 9: len 4; hex 80000014; asc     ;;---TRANSACTION 4615, ACTIVE 1579 sec, thread declared inside InnoDB 1222mysql tables in use 2, locked 02 lock struct(s), heap size 360, 1 row lock(s)MySQL thread id 3, OS thread handle 0x7f813c659700, query id 147 localhost root Sending dataselect count(*) from t3 a,t3 b   ## 这是线程3当前正在执行的SQLTrx read view will not see trx with id >= 4662, sees < 4659TABLE LOCK table `test`.`emp` trx id 4615 lock mode IX  ## 线程3中正在拥有表上的意向IX锁,并且有test.emp表上主键的行级X锁,page num=3RECORD LOCKS space id 16 page no 3 n bits 88 index `PRIMARY` of table `test`.`emp` trx id 4615 lock_mode X locks rec but not gapRecord lock, heap no 9 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 10; compact format; info bits 0 0: len 4; hex 80001e6c; asc    l;; 1: len 6; hex 000000001018; asc       ;; 2: len 7; hex 91000001420084; asc     B  ;; 3: len 5; hex 53434f5454; asc SCOTT;; 4: len 7; hex 414e414c595354; asc ANALYST;; 5: len 4; hex 80001d8e; asc     ;; 6: len 4; hex 208794f0; asc     ;; 7: len 4; hex 80000bb8; asc     ;; 8: SQL NULL; 9: len 4; hex 80000014; asc     ;;

为什么线程3当前执行的是一个select t3表操作,但却锁住了test.emp表上page num=3?
有可能是线程3之前对test.emp表的操作事务没有及时提交导致。
所以得出:线程3阻塞了线程7,而线程7又阻塞了线程4,所以根因就是线程3,让线程3尽快提交或是kill掉即可。


4. 结论

在分析innodb中锁阻塞时,几种方法的对比情况:

(1)使用show processlist查看不靠谱;
(2)直接使用show engine innodb status查看,无法判断到问题的根因;
(3)使用mysqladmin debug查看,能看到所有产生锁的线程,但无法判断哪个才是根因;
(4)开启innodb_lock_monitor后,再使用show engine innodb status查看,能够找到锁阻塞的根因。

blog地址:http://blog.csdn.net/hw_libo/article/details/39080809

-- Bosco  QQ:375612082
---- END ----
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
版权所有,文章允许转载,但必须以链接方式注明源地址,否则追究法律责任!

2 0
原创粉丝点击