Linkedlist与ArrayList的各种操作性能对比-单线程对比

来源:互联网 发布:highlight.js 行号 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/05/19 01:32

为了增加说服力,每一种操作都可以设置重复次数,重复次数越大,求平均的结果越有说服力。这里根据情况设置了1或者10(见main函数的注释)。有时间同学可以设大一些。

先贴结果:

分别对比的是:add(); addlast(); get(); remove() 方法。

insert into arraylist for 10 times cost:112insert into linkedlist for 10 times cost:128
insert into the last of arraylist for 10 times cost:32insert into the last of linkedlist for 10 times cost:33
find from arraylist for 1 times cost:6find from linkedlist for 1 times cost:5261
remove 1000 numbers from arraylist for 1 times cost:70remove 1000 numbers from linkedlist for 1 times cost:1


结果分析:

add方法:对比性能较为明显:linkedlist的插入时间明显长一些。

addlast方法:区别不大:从尾部插入至linkedlist时间可能还要短一些(原因有待分析)。

get方法:linkedlist 性能差很多。

remove方法:linkedlist明显优于arraylist。

上一篇从源代码上做了二者简单的分析。这一篇编写单线程代码对比二者性能。

贴代码:

import java.util.ArrayList;import java.util.LinkedList;/** * Created by aaashen on 2015/4/8. */public class Vs {    private ArrayList alist = new ArrayList<Integer>();    private LinkedList llist = new LinkedList<Integer>();    private long startTime,startTime2 = 0;    private long endTime,endTime2 = 0;    private long costTime,totalCostTime = 0;/** @param times* 求平均的次数* @param num* 向list中操作的次数* */    private void testArrayInsert(int times, int num) {        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            alist = null;            alist = new ArrayList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                alist.add(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("insert into arraylist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    private void testLinkedInsert(int times, int num){        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            llist = null;            llist = new LinkedList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                llist.add(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("insert into linkedlist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    private void testArrayInsertLast(int times, int num) {        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            alist = null;            alist = new ArrayList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                alist.add(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("insert into the last of arraylist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    private void testLinkedInsertLast(int times, int num){        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            llist = null;            llist = new LinkedList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                llist.addLast(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("insert into the last of linkedlist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    private void testArrayFind(int times, int num) {        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            alist = null;            alist = new ArrayList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                alist.add(i);            }            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                alist.get(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("find from arraylist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    private void testLinkedFind(int times, int num){        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            llist = null;            llist = new LinkedList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                llist.add(i);            }            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                llist.get(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("find from linkedlist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    /*    * @param times    * 求平均的次数    * @param num    * 向list中操作的次数    * @param num_remove    * 删除的次数    * */    private void testArrayRemove(int times, int num, int num_remove) {        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            alist = null;            alist = new ArrayList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                alist.add(i);            }            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num_remove; i++) {                alist.remove(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("remove "+num_remove+" numbers from arraylist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    private void testLinkedRemove(int times, int num, int num_remove){        long totalCostTime = 0;        long costTime = 0;        long startTime = 0;        long endTime = 0;        for(int j=0; j<times; j++) {            llist = null;            llist = new LinkedList<Integer>();            costTime = 0;            startTime = 0;            endTime = 0;            for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {                llist.add(i);            }            startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            for (int i = 0; i < num_remove; i++) {                llist.remove(i);            }            endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();            costTime = endTime - startTime;            totalCostTime += costTime;        }        System.out.println("remove " + num_remove + " numbers from linkedlist for "+times+" times cost:" + totalCostTime/times);    }    public static void main(String args[]){        Vs vs = new Vs();        //由于不同操作时间长度不同,为了减少等待时间,为同一个参数设置了大小。        int times_small = 1; //重复次数-小        int times_large = 10;//重复次数-大        int num_small = 100000;//操作次数-小        int num_large = 1000000;//操作次数-大        //插入操作时间较短,因此设置的都是大的参数,比较有代表性        vs.testArrayInsert(times_large,num_large);        vs.testLinkedInsert(times_large,num_large);        vs.testArrayInsertLast(times_large, num_large);        vs.testLinkedInsertLast(times_large, num_large);        //linkedlist删除操作花太久时间,因此传入了小的参数,不影响比较        vs.testArrayFind(times_small, num_small);        vs.testLinkedFind(times_small, num_small);        //删除操作直接设置为1000次删除        vs.testArrayRemove(times_small, num_small, 1000);        vs.testLinkedRemove(times_small, num_small, 1000);}}









1 0
原创粉丝点击