spring事务管理

来源:互联网 发布:治疗法术升级数据 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/14 16:14

spring对持久化的事务有编程式事务管理,也有在声明式事务管理的。先讲在代码上编码,即是编程式事务管理的。

一、基于编程式事务

JdbcTemplate jdbcTemplate = getJdbcTemplate();DataSourceTransactionManager transactionManager = new DataSourceTransactionManager(jdbcTemplate.getDataSource());  //建立事务的定义DefaultTransactionDefinition def = new DefaultTransactionDefinition();def.setPropagationBehavior(TransactionDefinition.PROPAGATION_REQUIRED);TransactionStatus status = transactionManager.getTransaction(def);try{   //更新用户表   String updateUserSql = "..";          jdbcTemplate.update(updateUserSql,new Object[] { ... });   transactionManager.commit(status);}catch(Exception e){  transactionManager.rollback(status);}

二、基于声明式事务

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:p="http://www.springframework.org/schema/p"xmlns:context="http://www.springframework.org/schema/context"xmlns:cache="http://www.springframework.org/schema/cache"    xmlns:tx="http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx"xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans              http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-3.0.xsd             http://www.springframework.org/schema/context              http://www.springframework.org/schema/context/spring-context-3.0.xsd           http://www.springframework.org/schema/cache            http://www.springframework.org/schema/cache/spring-cache-3.0.xsd       http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx            http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx/spring-tx-3.0.xsd" default-autowire="byName"><context:annotation-config/><!-- create dataSource through jdni-->   <bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jndi.JndiObjectFactoryBean">       <property name="jndiName" value="java:comp/env/openEAP_DS"/>   </bean><!-- dao --><bean id="indexDao" class="com.lam.alarm.dao.IndexDao"><property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"></property></bean><bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager"><property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/></bean><bean id="indexDaoProxy" class="org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionProxyFactoryBean"><property name="transactionManager" ref="transactionManager"></property><property name="target" ref="indexDao"></property><property name="transactionAttributes"><props><prop key="insert*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</prop><prop key="get*">PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly</prop></props></property></bean></beans>

配置中包含了dataSource,transactionManager等资源定义。这些资源都为一个名为indexDaoProxy 的TransactionProxyFactoryBean服务, 而indexDaoProxy 则对包含实际数据逻辑的indexDao进行了事务性封装。

 

可以看到,在indexDaoProxy 的"transactionAttributes"属性中,我们定义了针对indexDao 的事务策略,即将所有名称以insert 开始的方法(如indexDao.insert方法)纳入事务管理范围。如果此方法中抛出异常,则Spring将当前事务回滚,如果方法正常结束,则提交事务。


类org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionProxyFactoryBean的属性transactionAttributes配置的方法,

方法能设置的事务级别和事务传播特性的值可参考spring的接口:TransactionDefinition

public interface TransactionDefinition {/** * Support a current transaction; create a new one if none exists. * Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name. * <p>This is typically the default setting of a transaction definition, * and typically defines a transaction synchronization scope. */int PROPAGATION_REQUIRED = 0;/** * Support a current transaction; execute non-transactionally if none exists. * Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name. * <p><b>NOTE:</b> For transaction managers with transaction synchronization, * <code>PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS</code> is slightly different from no transaction * at all, as it defines a transaction scope that synchronization might apply to. * As a consequence, the same resources (a JDBC <code>Connection</code>, a * Hibernate <code>Session</code>, etc) will be shared for the entire specified * scope. Note that the exact behavior depends on the actual synchronization * configuration of the transaction manager! * <p>In general, use <code>PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS</code> with care! In particular, do * not rely on <code>PROPAGATION_REQUIRED</code> or <code>PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW</code> * <i>within</i> a <code>PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS</code> scope (which may lead to * synchronization conflicts at runtime). If such nesting is unavoidable, make sure * to configure your transaction manager appropriately (typically switching to * "synchronization on actual transaction"). * @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#setTransactionSynchronization * @see org.springframework.transaction.support.AbstractPlatformTransactionManager#SYNCHRONIZATION_ON_ACTUAL_TRANSACTION */int PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS = 1;/** * Support a current transaction; throw an exception if no current transaction * exists. Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name. * <p>Note that transaction synchronization within a <code>PROPAGATION_MANDATORY</code> * scope will always be driven by the surrounding transaction. */int PROPAGATION_MANDATORY = 2;/** * Create a new transaction, suspending the current transaction if one exists. * Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name. * <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box * on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to * {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager}, * which requires the <code>javax.transaction.TransactionManager</code> * to be made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard J2EE). * <p>A <code>PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW</code> scope always defines its own * transaction synchronizations. Existing synchronizations will be suspended * and resumed appropriately. * @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager */int PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW = 3;/** * Do not support a current transaction; rather always execute non-transactionally. * Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name. * <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual transaction suspension will not work out-of-the-box * on all transaction managers. This in particular applies to * {@link org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager}, * which requires the <code>javax.transaction.TransactionManager</code> * to be made available it to it (which is server-specific in standard J2EE). * <p>Note that transaction synchronization is <i>not</i> available within a * <code>PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED</code> scope. Existing synchronizations * will be suspended and resumed appropriately. * @see org.springframework.transaction.jta.JtaTransactionManager#setTransactionManager */int PROPAGATION_NOT_SUPPORTED = 4;/** * Do not support a current transaction; throw an exception if a current transaction * exists. Analogous to the EJB transaction attribute of the same name. * <p>Note that transaction synchronization is <i>not</i> available within a * <code>PROPAGATION_NEVER</code> scope. */int PROPAGATION_NEVER = 5;/** * Execute within a nested transaction if a current transaction exists, * behave like {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} else. There is no analogous * feature in EJB. * <p><b>NOTE:</b> Actual creation of a nested transaction will only work on specific * transaction managers. Out of the box, this only applies to the JDBC * {@link org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager} * when working on a JDBC 3.0 driver. Some JTA providers might support * nested transactions as well. * @see org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DataSourceTransactionManager */int PROPAGATION_NESTED = 6;/** * Use the default isolation level of the underlying datastore. * All other levels correspond to the JDBC isolation levels. * @see java.sql.Connection */int ISOLATION_DEFAULT = -1;/** * Indicates that dirty reads, non-repeatable reads and phantom reads * can occur. * <p>This level allows a row changed by one transaction to be read by * another transaction before any changes in that row have been committed * (a "dirty read"). If any of the changes are rolled back, the second * transaction will have retrieved an invalid row. * @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED */int ISOLATION_READ_UNCOMMITTED = Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED;/** * Indicates that dirty reads are prevented; non-repeatable reads and * phantom reads can occur. * <p>This level only prohibits a transaction from reading a row * with uncommitted changes in it. * @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED */int ISOLATION_READ_COMMITTED = Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED;/** * Indicates that dirty reads and non-repeatable reads are prevented; * phantom reads can occur. * <p>This level prohibits a transaction from reading a row with * uncommitted changes in it, and it also prohibits the situation * where one transaction reads a row, a second transaction alters * the row, and the first transaction rereads the row, getting * different values the second time (a "non-repeatable read"). * @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ */int ISOLATION_REPEATABLE_READ = Connection.TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ;/** * Indicates that dirty reads, non-repeatable reads and phantom reads * are prevented. * <p>This level includes the prohibitions in * {@link #ISOLATION_REPEATABLE_READ} and further prohibits the * situation where one transaction reads all rows that satisfy a * <code>WHERE</code> condition, a second transaction inserts a * row that satisfies that <code>WHERE</code> condition, and the * first transaction rereads for the same condition, retrieving * the additional "phantom" row in the second read. * @see java.sql.Connection#TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE */int ISOLATION_SERIALIZABLE = Connection.TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE;/** * Use the default timeout of the underlying transaction system, * or none if timeouts are not supported.  */int TIMEOUT_DEFAULT = -1;/** * Return the propagation behavior. * <p>Must return one of the <code>PROPAGATION_XXX</code> constants * defined on {@link TransactionDefinition this interface}. * @return the propagation behavior * @see #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED * @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#isActualTransactionActive() */int getPropagationBehavior();/** * Return the isolation level. * <p>Must return one of the <code>ISOLATION_XXX</code> constants * defined on {@link TransactionDefinition this interface}. * <p>Only makes sense in combination with {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} * or {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}. * <p>Note that a transaction manager that does not support custom * isolation levels will throw an exception when given any other level * than {@link #ISOLATION_DEFAULT}. * @return the isolation level */int getIsolationLevel();/** * Return the transaction timeout. * <p>Must return a number of seconds, or {@link #TIMEOUT_DEFAULT}. * <p>Only makes sense in combination with {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED} * or {@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}. * <p>Note that a transaction manager that does not support timeouts * will throw an exception when given any other timeout than * {@link #TIMEOUT_DEFAULT}. * @return the transaction timeout */int getTimeout();/** * Return whether to optimize as a read-only transaction. * <p>The read-only flag applies to any transaction context, whether * backed by an actual resource transaction * ({@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRED}/{@link #PROPAGATION_REQUIRES_NEW}) or * operating non-transactionally at the resource level * ({@link #PROPAGATION_SUPPORTS}). In the latter case, the flag will * only apply to managed resources within the application, such as a * Hibernate <code>Session</code>. * <p>This just serves as a hint for the actual transaction subsystem; * it will <i>not necessarily</i> cause failure of write access attempts. * A transaction manager that cannot interpret the read-only hint will * <i>not</i> throw an exception when asked for a read-only transaction. * @return <code>true</code> if the transaction is to be optimized as read-only  * @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronization#beforeCommit(boolean) * @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#isCurrentTransactionReadOnly() */boolean isReadOnly();/** * Return the name of this transaction. Can be <code>null</code>. * <p>This will be used as the transaction name to be shown in a * transaction monitor, if applicable (for example, WebLogic's). * <p>In case of Spring's declarative transactions, the exposed name * must (and will) be the * <code>fully-qualified class name + "." + method name</code> * (by default). * @return the name of this transaction * @see org.springframework.transaction.interceptor.TransactionAspectSupport * @see org.springframework.transaction.support.TransactionSynchronizationManager#getCurrentTransactionName() */String getName();}


Spring的事务配置的更详细, 可以参看:

Spring事务配置的五种方式

http://www.blogjava.net/robbie/archive/2009/04/05/264003.html

0 0
原创粉丝点击