Eight reasons I rejected your article
来源:互联网 发布:美女喜欢男生 知乎 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/05 01:20
A journal editor reveals the top reasons so many manuscripts don’t make it to the peer review process
By Peter Thrower, PhD Posted on 12 September 2012
http://www.elsevier.com/connect/8-reasons-i-rejected-your-article
The Author
As Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the international journal of the American Carbon Society, Dr. Peter Thrower experiences this situation first-hand. His advice to authors: "By avoiding these pitfalls, you will save reviewers, editors and staff time and frustration, and ensure that your work is judged by its scientific merit, not mistakes."
1. It fails the technical screening.
Before they even go to the editor-in-chief, articles are checked for technical elements. The main reasons they are rejected are:
Peter Thrower, PhD, is Editor-in-Chief of Carbon, the international journal of the American Carbon Society, and Professor Emeritus of Material Sciences and Engineering at Penn State University.
- The article contains elements that are suspected to be plagiarized, or it is currently under review at another journal. (Republishing articles or parts of articles, submitting to one or more journals at the same time or using text or images without permission is not allowed. See our ethical guidelines.)
- The manuscript is not complete; it may be lacking key elements such as the title, authors, affiliations, keywords, main text, references and all tables and figures).
- The English is not sufficient for the peer review process,
- The figures are not complete or are not clear enough to read.
- The article does not conform to the Guide for Authors for the journal it is submitted to.
- References are incomplete or very old.
2. It does not fall within the Aims and Scope.
- For the journal Carbon, the material studied may contain carbon, but is not carbon.
- The study uses a carbon material but the focus is on something different.
- There is no new carbon science.
3. It's incomplete.
- The article contains observations but is not a full study.
- It discusses findings in relation to some of the work in the field but ignores other important work.
4. The procedures and/or analysis of the data is seen to be defective.
- The study lacked clear control groups or other comparison metrics.
- The study did not conform to recognized procedures or methodology that can be repeated.
- The analysis is not statistically valid or does not follow the norms of the field.
5. The conclusions cannot be justified on the basis of the rest of the paper.
- The arguments are illogical, unstructured or invalid.
- The data does not support the conclusions.
- The conclusions ignore large portions of the literature.
6. It's is simply a small extension of a different paper, often from the same authors.
- Findings are incremental and do not advance the field.
- The work is clearly part of a larger study, chopped up to make as many articles as possible.
7. It's incomprehensible.
- The language, structure, or figures are so poor that the merit can't be assessed. Have a native English speaker read the paper. Even if you ARE a native English speaker. Need help? We offer language services.
8. It's boring.
- It is archival, incremental or of marginal interest to the field (see point 6).
- The question behind the work is not of interest in the field.
- The work is not of interest to the readers of the specific journals.
For more advice, check out the step-by-step guide How to Publish in an Elsevier Journal or the Publishing Connect Author Training Webcasts.
- Eight reasons I rejected your article
- 'Eight reasons I rejected your article'
- 8 reasons I accepted your article
- ‘8 reasons I accepted your article'
- 5 reasons why I won't steal your idea
- |||10 Reasons To Hate Your Bed_2035
- iPhone app rejected Reasons 2.13: Apps that are primarily marketing materials or advertisements will
- Top Ten Reasons Why XQuery 2005 Will Change Your Life
- 15 reasons why Sybase will be in your future
- 5 Reasons To Write Tests For Your Code
- Five Good Reasons to Use Spree Commerce for Your Storefront
- Article---For I LOVE
- eight
- Eight
- Eight
- eight
- Eight Ways Your Android App Can Leak Memory
- Eight Ways Your Android App Can Leak Memory
- 放在这里,看看能不能养出儿子?
- LeetCode 题解(122): House Robber II
- 自己动手开发简易的Web服务器
- 蚂蚁爬杆之动态演示
- 2015062801 - 祈福八仙水上乐园
- Eight reasons I rejected your article
- 8 reasons I accepted your article
- Opencv调用摄像头
- 11个超棒的iOS开发学习网站
- LeetCode 题解(123): Add and Search Word - Data structure design
- 2015062802 - EffactiveJava笔记 - 第40条 谨慎设计方法签名
- 中国上市公司价值排名100强名单
- 两个随机变量做运算的函数分布
- Section 1 to 4 Basics