windows平台时间函数性能比较QueryPerformanceCounter,GetTickCount,ftime,time,GetLocalTime,GetSystemTimeAsFileTim
来源:互联网 发布:关键字优化 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/08 17:32
http://gmd20.blog.163.com/blog/static/168439232012113111759514/
执行 10000000 次, 耗时 2258,369 微秒 QueryPerformanceCounter
执行 10000000 次, 耗时 26,347 微秒 GetTickCount
执行 10000000 次, 耗时 242,879 微秒 time()
c的时间函数 time(time_t) 大概比GetSystemTimeAsFileTime慢6倍,比_ftime 快6倍
执行 10000000 次, 耗时 1310,066 微秒 _ftime
执行 10000000 次, 耗时 1722,125 微秒 GetLocalTime
执行 10000000 次, 耗时 39,131 微秒 GetSystemTimeAsFileTime
GetLocalTime耗时等于 = GetSystemTimeAsFileTime 耗时+ FileTimeToSystemTime 的耗时
可以看到精度越高性能越差
GetTickCount 精度1毫秒 > GetLocalTime 精度100纳秒 (0.1 微秒) > QueryPerformanceCounter (搞不懂这个怎么这么差)
如果仅仅为了计算时间偏差,可以使用 GetSystemTimeAsFileTime,这个精度可以达到100纳秒,
msdn有个介绍。
http://msdn.microsoft.com/ZH-CN/library/windows/desktop/ms724284(v=vs.85).aspx
Contains a 64-bit value representing the number of 100-nanosecond intervals since January 1, 1601 (UTC).
It is not recommended that you add and subtract values from the FILETIME structure to obtain relative times. Instead, you should copy the low- and high-order parts of the file time to a ULARGE_INTEGER structure, perform 64-bit arithmetic on the QuadPart member, and copy the LowPart and HighPart members into the FILETIME structure.
Do not cast a pointer to a FILETIME structure to either a ULARGE_INTEGER* or __int64* value because it can cause alignment faults on 64-bit Windows.
测试代码如下
#include <iomanip>#include <fstream>#include <iostream>#include <map>#include <sstream>#include <list>#include <vector>#include <stdlib.h>#include <stdint.h>#include <stdio.h>#include <sys/types.h>#include <sys/timeb.h>#include <time.h>#include <Windows.h>#include "Trace.h"using namespace std; int main (int, char**){ LARGE_INTEGER freq, t0, t1; QueryPerformanceFrequency(&freq); size_t number = 10000000; int total_counter = 0; //LARGE_INTEGER t3; //struct timeb timebuffer; SYSTEMTIME lt; FILETIME SystemTimeAsFileTime; QueryPerformanceCounter(&t0); for (int i=0; i< number; i++) { //QueryPerformanceCounter(&t3); //total_counter += t3.LowPart; //total_counter += GetTickCount(); //ftime(&timebuffer); //total_counter += timebuffer.time; //GetLocalTime(<); //total_counter += lt.wMilliseconds; // total_counter += _time32(NULL); time(NULL) GetSystemTimeAsFileTime(&SystemTimeAsFileTime); FileTimeToSystemTime(&SystemTimeAsFileTime,<); total_counter += lt.wMilliseconds; } QueryPerformanceCounter(&t1); int time = (((t1.QuadPart-t0.QuadPart)*1000000)/freq.QuadPart); std::cout << "执行 " << number <<" 次, 耗时 " << time << " 微秒" << std::endl; std::cout << total_counter; int a; cin >> a; return 0;}
c语言精确到微妙 GetSystemTimeAsFileTime
c语言库函数中的clock()函数只能精确到ms,若想更精确的us,在网络上查了一遍,完整的可行的解决方案繁琐,实在没时间去仔细琢磨。不过找到了一个简洁的方案:调用GetSystemTimeAsFileTime函数,单位是100ns。
时间的单位换算 :
1秒=1000毫秒(ms) 1毫秒=1/1,000秒(s)
1秒=1,000,000 微秒(μs) 1微秒=1/1,000,000秒(s)
1秒=1,000,000,000 纳秒(ns) 1纳秒=1/1,000,000,000秒(s)
1秒=1,000,000,000,000 皮秒(ps) 1皮秒=1/1,000,000,000,0
- windows平台时间函数性能比较QueryPerformanceCounter,GetTickCount,ftime,time,GetLocalTime,GetSystemTimeAsFileTim
- windows平台时间函数性能比较QueryPerformanceCounter,GetTickCount,ftime,time,GetLocalTime,GetSystemTimeAsFileTim
- windows平台时间函数性能比较QueryPerformanceCounter,GetTickCount,ftime,time,GetLocalTime,GetSystemTimeAsFileTim
- 时间的函数,sleep,clock,gettickcount,QueryPerformanceCounter
- 时间的函数,sleep,clock,gettickcount,QueryPerformanceCounter
- 时间的函数,sleep,clock,gettickcount,QueryPerformanceCounter
- 时间的函数Sleep,clock,GetTickCount,QueryPerformanceCounter
- 时间的函数,sleep,clock,gettickcount,QueryPerformanceCounter
- 时间的函数Sleep,clock,GetTickCount,QueryPerformanceCounter
- 计算程序运行时间的函数Sleep,clock,GetTickCount,QueryPerformanceCounter
- //Windows系统下可以用 time(),clock(),timeGetTime(),GetTickCount(),QueryPerformanceCounter()来对一段程序代码进行计时
- linux、windows 时间函数性能比较
- c语言计算时间方法---clock-GetTickCount-QueryPerformanceCounter
- Windows API GetTickCount函数
- GetTickCount/QueryPerformanceFrequency/QueryPerformanceCounter
- time(NULL)与GetLocalTime获取当前时间
- time(NULL)与GetLocalTime获取当前时间
- time(),gettimeofday()及GetTickCount()效率比较
- 1005. 继续(3n+1)猜想 (25)
- 【java并发】线程同步工具Exchanger的使用
- 如何打造真正可动态扩展的服务架构
- centos6.5下搭建阿帕奇环境,查看静态页面
- Qt 预编译头文件(precompiled headers) 加快编译速度
- windows平台时间函数性能比较QueryPerformanceCounter,GetTickCount,ftime,time,GetLocalTime,GetSystemTimeAsFileTim
- U-BOOT移植心得
- android关于多dex打包的理解
- java练习——数组去重
- angular实现window.onload和$(document).ready
- 图像处理的算法SIFT具有尺度不变性
- 我写的那六本开源计算机书
- MapReduce概念理解
- 强悍的 ubuntu —— 命令行执行完毕通知(undistract-me)