Java1.8源码阅读-DualPivotQuicksort
来源:互联网 发布:mac玩qq堂 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/05 05:26
在刷leetcode时,涉及到一个排序算法时,自己采用的冒泡,和快速排序,出现超时问题,于是看了解决方案,解决方案采用的是Arrays.sort,于是对其内部实现排序进行了查看。总的来说,Arrays.sort在对int[] 数组进行排序时,根据其长度进行动态的排序算法选择。
基本流程:
- 1:如果长度小于 QUICKSORT_THRESHOLD(286),则采用非归并并排序
// Use Quicksort on small arrays if (right - left < QUICKSORT_THRESHOLD) { sort(a, left, right, true); return; }
- 1.1 如果长度小于INSERTION_SORT_THRESHOLD(47),则采用插入排序
int length = right - left + 1; // Use insertion sort on tiny arrays if (length < INSERTION_SORT_THRESHOLD) {
- 1.1.1 如果最左区间(以初始left开始的区间) leftmost:普通插入排序
if (leftmost) { /* * Traditional (without sentinel) insertion sort, * optimized for server VM, is used in case of * the leftmost part. */
- 1.1.2 否则 pair insertion sort,
/* * Every element from adjoining part plays the role * of sentinel, therefore this allows us to avoid the * left range check on each iteration. Moreover, we use * the more optimized algorithm, so called pair insertion * sort, which is faster (in the context of Quicksort) * than traditional implementation of insertion sort. */
1.2 否则采用快速排序算法
- 将数组划分为7段(大约),然后找出第2、3、4、5、6段的右端点对应的位置
- 对这5个位置上的数字进行插入排序,作为枢轴的候选
如果5个数都不相等
选取排序后的2、4作为枢轴,进行双枢轴排序 Dual-Pivot Quicksort
排序后如果,中间部分元素过多,可能原因是等于pivort1和等于pivort2的元素过多,则将其调整
否则,进行普通快速排序,枢轴排序后为第3个元素
2 否则,考虑timesort(归并排序的优化版本,对一会升序、一会降序的混合情况处理比较好)
- 2.1 创建Timesort run数组,大小为 MAX_RUN_COUNT(67)+1
/* * Index run[i] is the start of i-th run * (ascending or descending sequence). */ int[] run = new int[MAX_RUN_COUNT + 1]; int count = 0; run[0] = left;
- 2.1.1 a[run[i]] ~ a[run[i + 1]]之间为升序数组
2.1.2检查当前待排序数组是否适合使用Timsort,即run数组中升序数组个数,如果个数不小于MAX_RUN_COUNT则认为数组内元素排序比较混乱,适合非归并排序
注:对于连续下降的元素会将其调整为连续上升
2.2 如果通过上述检测,则进行归并排序
代码
插入排序
for (int i = left, j = i; i < right; j = ++i) { int ai = a[i + 1]; // 带插入元素 while (ai < a[j]) { // 寻找插入位置 a[j + 1] = a[j]; if (j-- == left) { break; } } a[j + 1] = ai; // 插入新元素}
改进版插入排序
pair insertion sort,每次插入两个元素
/** * 注:left左侧的内容均已排好序,默认的前提条件 *//* * Skip the longest ascending sequence. */do { if (left >= right) { return; }} while (a[++left] >= a[left - 1]);/* * Every element from adjoining part plays the role * of sentinel, therefore this allows us to avoid the * left range check on each iteration. Moreover, we use * the more optimized algorithm, so called pair insertion * sort, which is faster (in the context of Quicksort) * than traditional implementation of insertion sort. * 一次遍历插入两个元素 */for (int k = left; ++left <= right; k = ++left) { int a1 = a[k], a2 = a[left]; // 使得 a1 >= a2 if (a1 < a2) { a2 = a1; a1 = a[left]; } // 寻找a1的插入位置,相隔距离为2 while (a1 < a[--k]) { a[k + 2] = a[k]; } a[++k + 1] = a1; // 寻找a2的插入位置,相隔距离为1 while (a2 < a[--k]) { a[k + 1] = a[k]; } a[k + 1] = a2;}// 将最后一个位置插入到合适位置int last = a[right];while (last < a[--right]) { a[right + 1] = a[right];}a[right + 1] = last;
双枢轴排序 Dual-Pivot Quicksort
// Inexpensive approximation of length / 7int seventh = (length >> 3) + (length >> 6) + 1;/* * Sort five evenly spaced elements around (and including) the * center element in the range. These elements will be used for * pivot selection as described below. The choice for spacing * these elements was empirically determined to work well on * a wide variety of inputs. */int e3 = (left + right) >>> 1; // The midpointint e2 = e3 - seventh;int e1 = e2 - seventh;int e4 = e3 + seventh;int e5 = e4 + seventh;// Sort these elements using insertion sortif (a[e2] < a[e1]) { long t = a[e2]; a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }if (a[e3] < a[e2]) { long t = a[e3]; a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t; if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }}if (a[e4] < a[e3]) { long t = a[e4]; a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t; if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t; if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; } }}if (a[e5] < a[e4]) { long t = a[e5]; a[e5] = a[e4]; a[e4] = t; if (t < a[e3]) { a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t; if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t; if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; } } }}// Pointersint less = left; // The index of the first element of center partint great = right; // The index before the first element of right partif (a[e1] != a[e2] && a[e2] != a[e3] && a[e3] != a[e4] && a[e4] != a[e5]) { /* * Use the second and fourth of the five sorted elements as pivots. * These values are inexpensive approximations of the first and * second terciles of the array. Note that pivot1 <= pivot2. */ long pivot1 = a[e2]; long pivot2 = a[e4]; /* * The first and the last elements to be sorted are moved to the * locations formerly occupied by the pivots. When partitioning * is complete, the pivots are swapped back into their final * positions, and excluded from subsequent sorting. */ a[e2] = a[left]; a[e4] = a[right]; /* * Skip elements, which are less or greater than pivot values. */ while (a[++less] < pivot1); while (a[--great] > pivot2); /* * Partitioning: * * left part center part right part * +--------------------------------------------------------------+ * | < pivot1 | pivot1 <= && <= pivot2 | ? | > pivot2 | * +--------------------------------------------------------------+ * ^ ^ ^ * | | | * less k great * * Invariants: * * all in (left, less) < pivot1 * pivot1 <= all in [less, k) <= pivot2 * all in (great, right) > pivot2 * * Pointer k is the first index of ?-part. */ outer: for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) { long ak = a[k]; if (ak < pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part a[k] = a[less]; /* - Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i++;" instead - of "a[i++] = b;" due to performance issue. */ a[less] = ak; ++less; } else if (ak > pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part while (a[great] > pivot2) { if (great-- == k) { break outer; } } if (a[great] < pivot1) { // a[great] <= pivot2 a[k] = a[less]; a[less] = a[great]; ++less; } else { // pivot1 <= a[great] <= pivot2 a[k] = a[great]; } /* - Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i--;" instead - of "a[i--] = b;" due to performance issue. */ a[great] = ak; --great; } } // Swap pivots into their final positions a[left] = a[less - 1]; a[less - 1] = pivot1; a[right] = a[great + 1]; a[great + 1] = pivot2; // Sort left and right parts recursively, excluding known pivots sort(a, left, less - 2, leftmost); sort(a, great + 2, right, false); /* * If center part is too large (comprises > 4/7 of the array), * swap internal pivot values to ends. */ if (less < e1 && e5 < great) { /* * Skip elements, which are equal to pivot values. */ while (a[less] == pivot1) { ++less; } while (a[great] == pivot2) { --great; } /* * Partitioning: * * left part center part right part * +----------------------------------------------------------+ * | == pivot1 | pivot1 < && < pivot2 | ? | == pivot2 | * +----------------------------------------------------------+ * ^ ^ ^ * | | | * less k great * * Invariants: * * all in (*, less) == pivot1 * pivot1 < all in [less, k) < pivot2 * all in (great, *) == pivot2 * * Pointer k is the first index of ?-part. */ outer: for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) { long ak = a[k]; if (ak == pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part a[k] = a[less]; a[less] = ak; ++less; } else if (ak == pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part while (a[great] == pivot2) { if (great-- == k) { break outer; } } if (a[great] == pivot1) { // a[great] < pivot2 a[k] = a[less]; /* * Even though a[great] equals to pivot1, the * assignment a[less] = pivot1 may be incorrect, * if a[great] and pivot1 are floating-point zeros * of different signs. Therefore in float and * double sorting methods we have to use more * accurate assignment a[less] = a[great]. */ a[less] = pivot1; ++less; } else { // pivot1 < a[great] < pivot2 a[k] = a[great]; } a[great] = ak; --great; } } } // Sort center part recursively sort(a, less, great, false);} else { // Partitioning with one pivot /* * Use the third of the five sorted elements as pivot. * This value is inexpensive approximation of the median. */ long pivot = a[e3]; /* * Partitioning degenerates to the traditional 3-way * (or "Dutch National Flag") schema: * * left part center part right part * +-------------------------------------------------+ * | < pivot | == pivot | ? | > pivot | * +-------------------------------------------------+ * ^ ^ ^ * | | | * less k great * * Invariants: * * all in (left, less) < pivot * all in [less, k) == pivot * all in (great, right) > pivot * * Pointer k is the first index of ?-part. */ for (int k = less; k <= great; ++k) { if (a[k] == pivot) { continue; } long ak = a[k]; if (ak < pivot) { // Move a[k] to left part a[k] = a[less]; a[less] = ak; ++less; } else { // a[k] > pivot - Move a[k] to right part while (a[great] > pivot) { --great; } if (a[great] < pivot) { // a[great] <= pivot a[k] = a[less]; a[less] = a[great]; ++less; } else { // a[great] == pivot /* * Even though a[great] equals to pivot, the * assignment a[k] = pivot may be incorrect, * if a[great] and pivot are floating-point * zeros of different signs. Therefore in float * and double sorting methods we have to use * more accurate assignment a[k] = a[great]. */ a[k] = pivot; } a[great] = ak; --great; } } /* * Sort left and right parts recursively. * All elements from center part are equal * and, therefore, already sorted. */ sort(a, left, less - 1, leftmost); sort(a, great + 1, right, false);
timesort 归并排序
/* * Index run[i] is the start of i-th run * (ascending or descending sequence). */int[] run = new int[MAX_RUN_COUNT + 1];int count = 0; run[0] = left;// Check if the array is nearly sortedfor (int k = left; k < right; run[count] = k) { if (a[k] < a[k + 1]) { // ascending while (++k <= right && a[k - 1] <= a[k]); } else if (a[k] > a[k + 1]) { // descending // 将降序数组变为升序 while (++k <= right && a[k - 1] >= a[k]); for (int lo = run[count] - 1, hi = k; ++lo < --hi; ) { int t = a[lo]; a[lo] = a[hi]; a[hi] = t; } } else { // equal for (int m = MAX_RUN_LENGTH; ++k <= right && a[k - 1] == a[k]; ) { if (--m == 0) { sort(a, left, right, true); return; } } } /* * The array is not highly structured, * use Quicksort instead of merge sort. */ if (++count == MAX_RUN_COUNT) { sort(a, left, right, true); return; }}// Check special cases// Implementation note: variable "right" is increased by 1.if (run[count] == right++) { // The last run contains one element run[++count] = right;} else if (count == 1) { // The array is already sorted return;}// Determine alternation base for merge// 确定归并排序的迭代次数(每迭代一次,将相邻升序子序列合并,即run内元素数目减半)// 简单示例:a[1, 5, 2, 6, 3, 7, 4, 8] ==> a[1, 2, 5, 6, 3, 4, 7, 8]byte odd = 0;for (int n = 1; (n <<= 1) < count; odd ^= 1);// Use or create temporary array b for mergingint[] b; // temp array; alternates with aint ao, bo; // array offsets from 'left'int blen = right - left; // space needed for bif (work == null || workLen < blen || workBase + blen > work.length) { work = new int[blen]; workBase = 0;}// 根据归并的迭代次数,更改a,b// a,b中必有一个数组为原始数组,另一个为临时数组// 在归并的过程中,每迭代一次,run内元素数目减半,同时a,b会交换一次// 为了保证最后一次迭代后,原始数组内存有归并好的数据,需要进行如下考虑if (odd == 0) { System.arraycopy(a, left, work, workBase, blen); b = a; bo = 0; a = work; ao = workBase - left;} else { b = work; ao = 0; bo = workBase - left;}// Merging// a是原始数组,b是目标数组for (int last; count > 1; count = last) { // 合并两个相邻升序序列 for (int k = (last = 0) + 2; k <= count; k += 2) { // 确定边界 int hi = run[k], mi = run[k - 1]; for (int i = run[k - 2], p = i, q = mi; i < hi; ++i) { if (q >= hi || p < mi && a[p + ao] <= a[q + ao]) { b[i + bo] = a[p++ + ao]; } else { b[i + bo] = a[q++ + ao]; } } // 更新子序列标示 run[++last] = hi; } // 如果升序子序列个数为奇数,之前两两合并时,最后会剩余一个,将剩余的直接拷贝到b, 等待下一次合并 if ((count & 1) != 0) { for (int i = right, lo = run[count - 1]; --i >= lo; b[i + bo] = a[i + ao] ); run[++last] = right; } // 交换a b int[] t = a; a = b; b = t; int o = ao; ao = bo; bo = o;
阅读全文
0 0
- Java1.8源码阅读-DualPivotQuicksort
- Java源码阅读-DualPivotQuicksort
- java1.8版本hashTable源码阅读
- java1.8版本hashTable源码阅读
- Java源码解析-DualPivotQuicksort
- JDK DualPivotQuicksort 源码解析
- JDK DualPivotQuicksort 源码解析
- JDK DualPivotQuicksort 源码解析
- JDK源码笔记-DualPivotQuicksort
- JDK DualPivotQuicksort 源码解析
- Java1.8之ConcurrentHashMap源码
- 源码解析 ThreadPoolExecutor JAVA1.8
- DualPivotQuicKSort
- ThreadPoolExecutor源码解析(基于Java1.8)
- JAVA Queue源码分析 java1.8
- Java1.8集合源码:ArrayList 详细解析
- java1.8 常用集合源码学习:HashMap
- java1.8 常用集合源码学习:HashSet
- JSP内置对象和EL内置对象及区别解析
- 高级数据结构及算法分类
- CreateProcess 创建带命令行参数的进程时,报错或者提示内存位置无效的可能的一个原因
- 抽象类
- Android MVP(Model View Presenter)
- Java1.8源码阅读-DualPivotQuicksort
- delphi 身份证号码相关处理单元
- 四叉树-2D平面的渲染剔除、碰撞次数优化
- ssh整合 出现Could not obtain transaction-synchronized Session for current thread
- Java高级之异常
- form表单验证input标签内容
- CodeForces
- 环信JAVA服务端调用各接口完整实例
- Material Design之ToolBar