How to know that a triangle triple exists in one array?

来源:互联网 发布:手机工程算量软件 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/09 13:42

IT's just a mathematical derivation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

was stuck in solving the following interview practice question:
I have to write a function:

int triangle(int[] A);

that given a zero-indexed array A consisting of N integers returns 1 if there exists a triple (P, Q, R) such that 0 < P < Q < R < N.

A[P] + A[Q] > A[R],  A[Q] + A[R] > A[P],  A[R] + A[P] > A[Q].

The function should return 0 if such triple does not exist. Assume that 0 < N < 100,000. Assume that each element of the array is an integer in range [-1,000,000..1,000,000].

For example, given array A such that

A[0]=10, A[1]=2, A[2]=5, A[3]=1, A[4]=8, A[5]=20

the function should return 1, because the triple (0, 2, 4) fulfills all of the required conditions.

For array A such that

A[0]=10, A[1]=50, A[2]=5, A[3]=1

the function should return 0.

If I do a triple loop, this would be very very slow (complexity: O(n^3)). I am thinking maybe to use to store an extra copy of the array and sort it, and use a binary search for a particular number. But I don't know how to break down this problem.
Any ideas?

shareimprove this question
 
1 
(0, 2, 4) doesn't fit: 0 + 2 is not > 4. – Vlad Mar 22 '11 at 12:32
7 
He is mentioning the index numbers as the answer ... 10 , 5 , 8 – user506710 Mar 22 '11 at 12:33 
 
Does the first condition refer to the values of P R Q or the Index? Because, if P < Q < R, than two elements would fail to satisfy this condition. However, on codility, an array of two elements can be a triplet. This does not make sense to me. – Ray Suelzer Dec 27 '14 at 2:08
 
How can this be mark as painless? – jacktrades Nov 19 '15 at 19:36 

9 Answers

activeoldestvotes
up vote43down voteaccepted

First of all, you can sort your sequence. For the sorted sequence it's enough to check that A[i] + A[j] > A[k] for i < j < k, because A[i] + A[k] > A[k] > A[j] etc., so the other 2 inequalities are automatically true.

(From now on, i < j < k.)

Next, it's enough to check that A[i] + A[j] > A[j+1], because other A[k] are even bigger (so if the inequality holds for some k, it holds for k = j + 1 as well).

Next, it's enough to check that A[j-1] + A[j] > A[j+1], because other A[i] are even smaller (so if inequality holds for some i, it holds for i = j - 1 as well).

So, you have just a linear check: you need to check whether for at least one j A[j-1] + A[j] > A[j+1] holds true.

Altogether O(N log N) {sorting} + O(N) {check} = O(N log N).


Addressing the comment about negative numbers: indeed, this is what I didn't consider in the original solution. Considering the negative numbers doesn't change the solution much, since no negative number can be a part of triangle triple. Indeed, if A[i]A[j] and A[k] form a triangle triple, then A[i] + A[j] > A[k]A[i] + A[k] > A[j], which implies 2 * A[i] + A[j] + A[k] > A[k] + A[j], hence 2 * A[i] > 0, so A[i] > 0 and by symmetry A[j] > 0A[k] > 0.

This means that we can safely remove negative numbers and zeroes from the sequence, which is done in O(log n) after sorting.

shareimprove this answer
 
5 
Nice job. [15chars] – st0le Mar 22 '11 at 12:56
 
@st0le: thanks! – Vlad Mar 22 '11 at 13:09
 
Thanks for sharing the idea Vlad. This really helps to break down the problem into an easier task. Thanks ! – all_by_grace Mar 22 '11 at 15:19
4 
@useless: Nope. Obviously if a triple exists in the sorted array, it must exist in the original array (just map the indices back and sort them). You can see that the problem is symmetric w.r.t. index swapping. – Vlad Apr 17 '13 at 10:11
1 
"it's enough to check that A[i] + A[j] > A[k] for i < j < k, because A[i] + A[k] > A[k]" If A[i] is negative, A[i] + A[k] < A[k] ... – Chan Le Feb 26 '14

Count the number of possible triangles

Given an unsorted array of positive integers. Find the number of triangles that can be formed with three different array elements as three sides of triangles. For a triangle to be possible from 3 values, the sum of any two values (or sides) must be greater than the third value (or third side).
For example, if the input array is {4, 6, 3, 7}, the output should be 3. There are three triangles possible {3, 4, 6}, {4, 6, 7} and {3, 6, 7}. Note that {3, 4, 7} is not a possible triangle.
As another example, consider the array {10, 21, 22, 100, 101, 200, 300}. There can be 6 possible triangles: {10, 21, 22}, {21, 100, 101}, {22, 100, 101}, {10, 100, 101}, {100, 101, 200} and {101, 200, 300}

We strongly recommend that you click here and practice it, before moving on to the solution.


Method 1 (Brute force)
The brute force method is to run three loops and keep track of the number of triangles possible so far. The three loops select three different values from array, the innermost loop checks for the triangle property ( the sum of any two sides must be greater than the value of third side).

Time Complexity: O(N^3) where N is the size of input array.

Method 2 (Tricky and Efficient)
Let a, b and c be three sides. The below condition must hold for a triangle (Sum of two sides is greater than the third side)
i) a + b > c
ii) b + c > a
iii) a + c > b

Following are steps to count triangle.

1. Sort the array in non-decreasing order. 

2. Initialize two pointers ‘i’ and ‘j’ to first and second elements respectively, and initialize count of triangles as 0.

3. Fix ‘i’ and ‘j’ and find the rightmost index ‘k’ (or largest ‘arr[k]’) such that ‘arr[i] + arr[j] > arr[k]’. The number of triangles that can be formed with ‘arr[i]’ and ‘arr[j]’ as two sides is ‘k – j’. Add ‘k – j’ to count of triangles. 

Let us consider ‘arr[i]’ as ‘a’, ‘arr[j]’ as b and all elements between ‘arr[j+1]’ and ‘arr[k]’ as ‘c’. The above mentioned conditions (ii) and (iii) are satisfied because ‘arr[i] < arr[j] < arr[k]'. And we check for condition (i) when we pick 'k'4. Increment ‘j’ to fix the second element again. 

Note that in step 3, we can use the previous value of ‘k’. The reason is simple, if we know that the value of ‘arr[i] + arr[j-1]’ is greater than ‘arr[k]’, then we can say ‘arr[i] + arr[j]’ will also be greater than ‘arr[k]’, because the array is sorted in increasing order.

5. If ‘j’ has reached end, then increment ‘i’. Initialize ‘j’ as ‘i + 1′, ‘k’ as ‘i+2′ and repeat the steps 3 and 4.

Following is implementation of the above approach.

  • C/C++
  • Java
  • Python
# Python function to count all possible triangles with arr[]
# elements
 
deffindnumberofTriangles(arr):
 
    # Sort array and initialize count as 0
    n= len(arr)
    arr.sort()
    count= 0
 
    # Fix the first element.  We need to run till n-3 as
    # the other two elements are selected from arr[i+1...n-1]
    fori inrange(0,n-2):
 
        # Initialize index of the rightmost third element
        k= i + 2
 
        # Fix the second element
        forj inrange(i+1,n):
 
            # Find the rightmost element which is smaller
            # than the sum of two fixed elements
            # The important thing to note here is, we use
            # the previous value of k. If value of arr[i] +
            # arr[j-1] was greater than arr[k], then arr[i] +
            # arr[j] must be greater than k, because the array
            # is sorted.
            while(k < n andarr[i] +arr[j] > arr[k]):
                k+=1
 
             # Total number of possible triangles that can be
             # formed with the two fixed elements is k - j - 1.
             # The two fixed elements are arr[i] and arr[j]. All
             # elements between arr[j+1] to arr[k-1] can form a
             # triangle with arr[i] and arr[j]. One is subtracted
             # from k because k is incremented one extra in above
             # while loop. k will always be greater than j. If j
             # becomes equal to k, then above loop will increment k,
             #  because arr[k] + arr[i] is always greater than arr[k]
            count+=k -j -1
 
    returncount
 
# Driver function to test above function
arr= [10,21,22,100,101,200,300]
print"Number of Triangles:",findnumberofTriangles(arr)
 
# This code is contributed by Devesh Agrawal


Output:
Total number of triangles possible is 6

Time Complexity: O(n^2). The time complexity looks more because of 3 nested loops. If we take a closer look at the algorithm, we observe that k is initialized only once in the outermost loop. The innermost loop executes at most O(n) time for every iteration of outer most loop, because k starts from i+2 and goes upto n for all values of j. Therefore, the time complexity is O(n^2).


0 0
原创粉丝点击