算法设计与应用基础:第十三周(2)

来源:互联网 发布:阿里云网站监控 编辑:程序博客网 时间:2024/06/14 11:57

376. Wiggle Subsequence

DescriptionHintsSubmissionsSolutions
  • Total Accepted: 21573
  • Total Submissions: 61284
  • Difficulty: Medium
  • Contributor: LeetCode

A sequence of numbers is called a wiggle sequence if the differences between successive numbers strictly alternate between positive and negative. The first difference (if one exists) may be either positive or negative. A sequence with fewer than two elements is trivially a wiggle sequence. 

For example, [1,7,4,9,2,5] is a wiggle sequence because the differences (6,-3,5,-7,3) are alternately positive and negative. In contrast, [1,4,7,2,5] and [1,7,4,5,5] are not wiggle sequences, the first because its first two differences are positive and the second because its last difference is zero.

Given a sequence of integers, return the length of the longest subsequence that is a wiggle sequence. A subsequence is obtained by deleting some number of elements (eventually, also zero) from the original sequence, leaving the remaining elements in their original order.

Examples:

Input: [1,7,4,9,2,5]Output: 6The entire sequence is a wiggle sequence.Input: [1,17,5,10,13,15,10,5,16,8]Output: 7There are several subsequences that achieve this length. One is [1,17,10,13,10,16,8].Input: [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]Output: 2

Follow up:
Can you do it in O(n) time?


解题思路:模拟构造的过程,首先找到第一对发生摇摆的元素,然后开始遍历检索,巧妙的地方在于对于每次遍历,最终都会修改pre的值,因为如果满足摇摆则肯定修改;如果不满足,那么当前遍历值比pre值对于之后序列发生摇摆的可能性更大,举个例子,[1,3,7,4],pre是3,当前元素是7,那么虽然7不满足摇摆,但是对于pre(3),7比它更可能发生摇摆(结果就是1,7,4为摇摆序列;另外一种对立情况和上述原因一样。代码如下

class Solution {public:int wiggleMaxLength(vector<int>& nums) {        int n=nums.size();        if(n<2) return n;        int i;          for(i=0;i<n-1;i++){//找到第一个有意义的差值              if(nums[i]!=nums[i+1]){                  break;              }          }          if(i == (n-1)){//所有数都相同              return 1;          }        int p,pre=nums[i+1],res=2;        bool increasing=nums[i]<nums[i+1];        for(p=i+2;p<n;p++){            if(increasing&&pre>nums[p]){                increasing=!increasing;                res++;            }            else if(!increasing&&pre<nums[p]){                    increasing=!increasing;                    res++;                }                        pre=nums[p];        }        return res;    } };

感想:一开始这道题自己用的是找到到当前遍历元素为止的最大摇摆序列(和最终答案思路一样,但是没有想到先找到第一对摇摆元素,使得dp的初始情况比较复杂,最终也使得算法错误,本答案简化之处在于两点:1.先找到第一对摇摆值 2.局部利用贪心每次修改pre值使得最优子结构满足最终情况。

原创粉丝点击