Laplace方程求解

来源：互联网发布：js 日期范围选择控件编辑：程序博客网时间：2024/04/29 14:34

Laplace Equation

From Wikiversity

Jump to: navigation, search

[hide]

1Laplace Equation
- 1.1Solution to Case with 1 Non-homogeneous Boundary Condition
  - 1.1.1Step 1: Separate Variables
  - 1.1.2Step 2: Translate Boundary Conditions
  - 1.1.3Step 3: Solve the Sturm-Liouville Problem
  - 1.1.4Step 4: Solve Remaining ODE
  - 1.1.5Step 5: Combine Solutions
- 1.2Solution to Case with 4 Non-homogeneous Boundary Conditions

Laplace Equation[edit]

The Laplace equation is a basic PDE that arises in the heat and diffusion equations. The Laplace equation is defined as:

$\nabla^2 u = 0 \Rightarrow \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x_1^2} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x_2^2} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x_3^2} = 0 ~.$

Solution to Case with 1 Non-homogeneous Boundary Condition[edit]

In a condensed notation in (x,y,z) rectangular coordinates, the Laplace equation in two dimensions reduces to:

$u_{xx}+u_{yy} = 0, u(x,y) ~.$

The solution to the case with 1 non-homogeneous boundary condition is the most basic solution type. For the purposes of this example, we consider that the following boundary conditions hold true for this equation:

$x=0: u(0,y)=f(y)$
$x=L: u(L,y)=0$
$y=0: u(x,0)=0$
$y=M: u(x,M)=0$

Step 1: Separate Variables[edit]

To solve this equation, we assume that the function $u(x,y)$ is comprised of two functions $\textstyle X(x)$ and $\textstyle Y(y)$ such that $\textstyle u(x,y)=X(x)Y(y)$ . Hence, $u_{xx}=X''(x)Y(y)$ and $u_{yy}=X(x)Y''(y) ~.$ Making the substitutions into the Laplace equation, we get:

$X''Y+XY''=0$

$\Rightarrow \frac{X''}{X} + \frac{Y''}{Y} = 0$

$\Rightarrow \frac{X''}{X} = -\frac{Y''}{Y} = \mu$

The $\mu$ is called a separation constant because the solution to the equation must yield a constant. Because of the separation constant, it yields two linear ODEs:

$X''-\mu X=0$
$Y''+\mu Y=0$

Step 2: Translate Boundary Conditions[edit]

Translating the boundary conditions allows us to divide the boundary conditions among the variables. This division yields:

$u(0,y)=X(0)Y(y)=f(x) \quad \forall y \in \lbrack 0,M \rbrack$
$u(L,y)=X(L)Y(y)=0 \quad \forall y \in \lbrack 0,M \rbrack \Rightarrow X(L)=0$
$u(x,0)=X(x)Y(y)=0 \quad \forall x \in \lbrack 0,L \rbrack \Rightarrow Y(0)=0$
$u(x,M)=X(x)Y(y)=0 \quad \forall x \in \lbrack 0,L \rbrack \Rightarrow Y(M)=0$

Step 3: Solve the Sturm-Liouville Problem[edit]

The last two boundary conditions are homogeneous boundary conditions for the function $Y(y)$ . Using the solution to theSturm-Liouville problems (SLP), we can easily get a function for $Y(y)$ . The following is a fairly simple SLP:

$\begin{cases}Y''+\mu Y = 0 \\Y(0)=0 \\Y(M)=0 \end{cases}$

The solution to the SLP yields the following information:

$\mu = \frac{(n+1)^2\pi^2}{M^2},n=0,1,2,\cdots$
$Y_n(y)=\sin \frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M},n=0,1,2,\cdots$

The solution we obtained is a family of solutions dependent on the value for n.

Step 4: Solve Remaining ODE[edit]

The remaining ODE that we have doesn't have a SLP solution to it because we only know one boundary condition for it. We have to use what we obtained from the SLP solution to help us solve this ODE. We obtained the following information from steps 1 and 2:

$\begin{cases}X''-\mu X = 0 \\X(L)=0 \end{cases}$

From analyzing the second order ODE, we obtain the characteristic equation $\textstyle m^2-\mu=0 \Rightarrow m^2=\mu \Rightarrow \mu = \pm \frac{(n+1)\pi}{M},n=0,1,2,\cdots ~.$ Out of the solution set that results from the exponentials, the only viable solution that arises is:

$X_n(x)=C_1 \cosh \frac{(n+1)\pi(x-L)}{M} + C_2 \sinh \frac{(n+1)\pi(x-L)}{M} ~.$

The substitution of (x-L) instead of x in the equation results only in a shift in the eigenspace, so it is valid and it helps us apply the boundary condition. Since $X(L)=0, C_1=0$ . For convenience, we choose $C_2=1~.$ The resulting equation is:

$X_n(x)=\sinh \frac{(n+1)\pi(x-L)}{M}, n=0,1,2,\cdots ~.$

Step 5: Combine Solutions[edit]

We obtained equations for our separate variable functions and now we can substitute into our assumption in step 1. The substitution yields:

$u_n(x,y)=\sinh \frac{(n+1)\pi(x-L)}{M} \sin \frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}$

This function only satisfies the 3 homogeneous boundary conditions, however. To solve for the solution to the non-homogeneous boundary condition, we must consider that the complete solution consists of the following infinite series of terms:

$\begin{align}u(x,y) & :=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n u_n(x,y) \\& = \sum_{n=0}^\infty a_n \sinh \frac{(n+1)\pi(x-L)}{M} \sin \frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}\end{align}$

At the non-homogeneous boundary condition:

$f(y)=u(0,y)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \underbrace {a_n \sinh \frac{(n+1)\pi(0-L)}{M}}_{A_n} \sin \frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}$

This is an orthogonal expansion of $f$ relative to the orthogonal basis of the sine function. The term $A_n$ is a Fourier coefficient which is defined as the inner product:

$A_n=\frac{\int\limits_{0}^{M} f(y)\sin(\frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}) dy}{\int\limits_{0}^{M} \sin^2 \frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}}=\frac{2}{M} \int\limits_{0}^{M} f(y)\sin(\frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}) dy, n=0,1,2,\cdots$

Thus, the coefficient of the infinite series solution $a_n$ is:

$a_n=-\frac{2}{M\sinh\frac{(n+1)\pi L}{M}}\int\limits_{0}^{M} f(y)\sin\left(\frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}\right) dy, n=0,1,2,\cdots~.$

So, the entire general solution to the Laplace equation is:

$u(x,y)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty \left [ -\frac{2}{M\sinh\frac{(n+1)\pi L}{M}}\int\limits_{0}^{M} f(y)\sin\left(\frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}\right) dy \right ] \sinh \frac{(n+1)\pi(x-L)}{M} \sin \frac{(n+1)\pi y}{M}~.$

This is the general solution for the specific set of boundary conditions we assumed at the beginning. Other boundary conditions will yield a different solution. You can see the solution graphically by entering in a partial sum (e.g. n starts at 0 and ends at 10) into a numerical solver like Mathematica or Maple.

Solution to Case with 4 Non-homogeneous Boundary Conditions[edit]

Because $\nabla^2$ is a linear operator, any solutions to the equation $\nabla^2u=0$ can be added together and the result will also be a solution to the equation. This is the superposition principle.

Because of superposition, we can solve the case where all four boundary conditions are non-homogeneous. To illustrate how this will work, let's take the boundary conditions:

$\begin{array}{lcl} u(x,0) & = & f_1(x) \\ u(x,M) & = & f_2(x) \\ u(0,y) & = & f_3(x) \\ u(L,y) & = & f_4(x)\end{array}$

We divide this problem into 4 sub-problems, each one containing one of the non-homogeneous boundary conditions and each one subject to the Laplace equation condition, $\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}(u_n)+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}(u_n)=0~.$ We get the following boundary conditions for the 4 sub-problems:

$\left \{ \begin{array}{lcl} u_1(x,0) & = & f_1(x) \\ u_1(x,M) & = & 0 \\ u_1(0,y) & = & 0 \\ u_1(L,y) & = & 0\end{array} \right .$
$\left \{ \begin{array}{lcl} u_2(x,0) & = & 0 \\ u_2(x,M) & = & f_2(x) \\ u_2(0,y) & = & 0 \\ u_2(L,y) & = & 0\end{array} \right .$
$\left \{ \begin{array}{lcl} u_3(x,0) & = & 0 \\ u_3(x,M) & = & 0 \\ u_3(0,y) & = & f_3(x) \\ u_3(L,y) & = & 0\end{array} \right .$
$\left \{ \begin{array}{lcl} u_4(x,0) & = & 0 \\ u_4(x,M) & = & 0 \\ u_4(0,y) & = & 0 \\ u_4(L,y) & = & f_4(x)\end{array} \right .$

In this case, we used all Dirichlet type boundary conditions, meaning that the boundary condition depends on the function value (e.g. $u(x,y)=f(x)$ ). If you are using any combination of Dirichlet, Neumann (e.g. $u_x(x,y)=f(x) ~.$ ), Robin (e.g. $u(x,y)+u_x(x,y)=f(x)$ ) types of boundary conditions, the types of the boundary conditions should be preserved in every sub-problem (e.g. if $u_x(L,y)=f(x)$ , then the boundary condition is $u_x(L,y)=0$ when the boundary condition is made homogeneous and $u_x(L,y)=f(x)$ when it is the non-homogeneous boundary condition in a sub-problem).

Using the superposition principle, the complete solution to the 4 non-homogeneous boundary condition case is constructed by adding up all the solutions from the 4 sub-problems. In equation form, $u(x,y)=u_1(x,y)+u_2(x,y)+u_3(x,y)+u_4(x,y)~.$ Each sub-problem can be solved using the method for the case with 1 non-homogeneous boundary condition as shown above.